Contents 1 History 1.1 Darwin 1.2 Ronald Fisher 2 Theory 2.1 Reproductive success 2.2 Modern interpretation 2.3 Toolkit of natural selection 2.4 Sexual dimorphism 3 In different taxa 4 References 4.1 Citations 4.2 Sources 5 External links


History[edit] Darwin[edit] Sexual selection was first proposed by Charles Darwin in The Origin of Species (1859) and developed in The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (1871), as he felt that natural selection alone was unable to account for certain types of non-survival adaptations. He once wrote to a colleague that "The sight of a feather in a peacock's tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me sick!" His work divided sexual selection into male-male competition and female choice. ... depends, not on a struggle for existence, but on a struggle between the males for possession of the females; the result is not death to the unsuccessful competitor, but few or no offspring.[6] ... when the males and females of any animal have the same general habits ... but differ in structure, colour, or ornament, such differences have been mainly caused by sexual selection.[7] These views were to some extent opposed by Alfred Russel Wallace, mostly after Darwin's death. He accepted that sexual selection could occur, but argued that it was a relatively weak form of selection. He argued that male-male competitions were forms of natural selection, but that the "drab" peahen's coloration is itself adaptive as camouflage. In his opinion, ascribing mate choice to females was attributing the ability to judge standards of beauty to animals (such as beetles) far too cognitively undeveloped to be capable of aesthetic feeling.[8] Ronald Fisher[edit] Ronald Fisher, the English statistician and evolutionary biologist developed a number of ideas about sexual selection in his 1930 book The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection including the sexy son hypothesis and Fisher's principle. The Fisherian runaway describes how sexual selection accelerates the preference for a specific ornament, causing the preferred trait and female preference for it to increase together in a positive feedback runaway cycle. In a remark that was not widely understood[9] for another 50 years he said: ... plumage development in the male, and sexual preference for such developments in the female, must thus advance together, and so long as the process is unchecked by severe counterselection, will advance with ever-increasing speed. In the total absence of such checks, it is easy to see that the speed of development will be proportional to the development already attained, which will therefore increase with time exponentially, or in geometric progression. —Ronald Fisher, 1930 Male long-tailed widowbird This causes a dramatic increase in both the male's conspicuous feature and in female preference for it, until practical, physical constraints halt further exaggeration. A positive feedback loop is created, producing extravagant physical structures in the non-limiting sex. A classic example of female choice and potential runaway selection is the long-tailed widowbird. While males have long tails that are selected for by female choice, female tastes in tail length are still more extreme with females being attracted to tails longer than those that naturally occur.[10] Fisher understood that female preference for long tails may be passed on genetically, in conjunction with genes for the long tail itself. Long-tailed widowbird offspring of both sexes inherit both sets of genes, with females expressing their genetic preference for long tails, and males showing off the coveted long tail itself.[9] Richard Dawkins presents a non-mathematical explanation of the runaway sexual selection process in his book The Blind Watchmaker.[9] Females that prefer long tailed males tend to have mothers that chose long-tailed fathers. As a result, they carry both sets of genes in their bodies. That is, genes for long tails and for preferring long tails become linked. The taste for long tails and tail length itself may therefore become correlated, tending to increase together. The more tails lengthen, the more long tails are desired. Any slight initial imbalance between taste and tails may set off an explosion in tail lengths. Fisher wrote that: The exponential element, which is the kernel of the thing, arises from the rate of change in hen taste being proportional to the absolute average degree of taste. —Ronald Fisher, 1932[11] The peacock tail in flight, the classic example of a Fisherian runaway The female widow bird chooses to mate with the most attractive long-tailed male so that her progeny, if male, will themselves be attractive to females of the next generation - thereby fathering many offspring that carry the female's genes. Since the rate of change in preference is proportional to the average taste amongst females, and as females desire to secure the services of the most sexually attractive males, an additive effect is created that, if unchecked, can yield exponential increases in a given taste and in the corresponding desired sexual attribute. It is important to notice that the conditions of relative stability brought about by these or other means, will be far longer duration than the process in which the ornaments are evolved. In most existing species the runaway process must have been already checked, and we should expect that the more extraordinary developments of sexual plumage are not due like most characters to a long and even course of evolutionary progress, but to sudden spurts of change. —Ronald Fisher, 1930 Since Fisher's initial conceptual model of the 'runaway' process, Russell Lande[12] and Peter O'Donald[13] have provided detailed mathematical proofs that define the circumstances under which runaway sexual selection can take place.


Theory[edit] Reproductive success[edit] Extinct Irish elk (Megaloceros giganteus). These antlers span 2.7 metres (8.9 ft) and have a mass of 40 kg (88 lb). The reproductive success of an organism is measured by the number of offspring left behind, and their quality or probable fitness. Sexual preference creates a tendency towards assortative mating or homogamy. The general conditions of sexual discrimination appear to be (1) the acceptance of one mate precludes the effective acceptance of alternative mates, and (2) the rejection of an offer is followed by other offers, either certainly, or at such high chance that the risk of non-occurrence is smaller than the chance advantage to be gained by selecting a mate. The conditions determining which sex becomes the more limited resource in intersexual selection can be best understood by way of Bateman's principle which states that the sex which invests the most in producing offspring becomes a limiting resource over which the other sex competes", illustrated by the greater nutritional investment of an egg in a zygote, and the limited capacity of females to reproduce; for example in humans a woman can only give birth every ten months whereas in theory a male can become a father every day. Modern interpretation[edit] Male mountain gorilla, a tournament species The sciences of evolutionary psychology, human behavioural ecology, and sociobiology study the influence of sexual selection in humans. Darwin's ideas on sexual selection were met with scepticism by his contemporaries and not considered of great importance in the early 20th century, until in the 1930s biologists decided to include sexual selection as a mode of natural selection.[14] Only in the 21st century have they become more important in biology.[15] The theory however is generally applicable and analogous to natural selection.[16] Flour beetle Tungara frog Research in 2015 indicates that sexual selection, including mate choice, "improves population health and protects against extinction, even in the face of genetic stress from high levels of inbreeding" and "ultimately dictates who gets to reproduce their genes into the next generation - so it's a widespread and very powerful evolutionary force." The study involved the flour beetle over a ten-year period where the only changes were in the intensity of sexual selection.[5] Another theory, the handicap principle of Amotz Zahavi, Russell Lande and W. D. Hamilton, holds that the fact that the male is able to survive until and through the age of reproduction with such a seemingly maladaptive trait is taken by the female to be a testament to his overall fitness. Such handicaps might prove he is either free of or resistant to disease, or that he possesses more speed or a greater physical strength that is used to combat the troubles brought on by the exaggerated trait. Zahavi's work spurred a re-examination of the field, which has produced an ever-accelerating number of theories. In 1984, Hamilton and Marlene Zuk introduced the "Bright Male" hypothesis, suggesting that male elaborations might serve as a marker of health, by exaggerating the effects of disease and deficiency. In 1990, Michael Ryan and A.S. Rand, working with the tungara frog, proposed the hypothesis of "Sensory Exploitation", where exaggerated male traits may provide a sensory stimulation that females find hard to resist. Subsequently, the theories of the "Gravity Hypothesis" by Jordi Moya-Larano et al. (2002), invoking a simple biomechanical model to account for the adaptive value for smaller male spiders of speed in clmbing vertical surfaces,[17] and "Chase Away" by Brett Holland and William R. Rice have been added. In the late 1970s, Janzen and Mary Willson, noting that male flowers are often larger than female flowers, expanded the field of sexual selection into plants.[citation needed] In the past few years, the field has exploded to include other areas of study, not all of which fit Darwin's definition of sexual selection. These include cuckoldry, nuptial gifts, sperm competition, infanticide (especially in primates), physical beauty, mating by subterfuge, species isolation mechanisms, male parental care, ambiparental care, mate location, polygamy, and homosexual rape in certain male animals.[citation needed] Focusing on the effect of sexual conflict, as hypothesized by William Rice, Locke Rowe et Göran Arnvist, Thierry Lodé argues that divergence of interest constitutes a key for evolutionary process. Sexual conflict leads to an antagonistic co-evolution in which one sex tends to control the other, resulting in a tug of war. Besides, the sexual propaganda theory only argued that mate were opportunistically lead, on the basis of various factors determining the choice such as phenotypic characteristics, apparent vigour of individual, strength of mate signals, trophic resources, territoriality etc. and could explain the maintenance of genetic diversity within populations.[18] Several workers have brought attention to the fact that elaborated characters that ought to be costly in one way or another for their bearers (e.g., the tails of some species of Xiphophorus fish) do not always appear to have a cost in terms of energetics, performance or even survival. One possible explanation for the apparent lack of costs is that "compensatory traits" have evolved in concert with the sexually selected traits.[19] Toolkit of natural selection[edit] Protarchaeopteryx - skull based on Incisivosaurus and wings on Caudipteryx Sexual selection may explain how certain characteristics (such as feathers) had distinct survival value at an early stage in their evolution. Geoffrey Miller proposes that sexual selection might have contributed by creating evolutionary modules such as Archaeopteryx feathers as sexual ornaments, at first. The earliest proto-birds such as China's Protarchaeopteryx, discovered in the early 1990s, had well-developed feathers but no sign of the top/bottom asymmetry that gives wings lift. Some have suggested that the feathers served as insulation, helping females incubate their eggs. But perhaps the feathers served as the kinds of sexual ornaments still common in most bird species, and especially in birds such as peacocks and birds-of-paradise today. If proto-bird courtship displays combined displays of forelimb feathers with energetic jumps, then the transition from display to aerodynamic functions could have been relatively smooth.[20] Sexual selection sometimes generates features that may help cause a species' extinction, as has been suggested[20] for the giant antlers of the Irish elk (Megaloceros giganteus) that became extinct in Pleistocene Europe.[21] However, sexual selection can also do the opposite, driving species divergence - sometimes through elaborate changes in genitalia - such that new species emerge.[22] Sexual dimorphism[edit] This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Main article: Sexual dimorphism Sex differences directly related to reproduction and serving no direct purpose in courtship are called primary sexual characteristics. Traits amenable to sexual selection, which give an organism an advantage over its rivals (such as in courtship) without being directly involved in reproduction, are called secondary sex characteristics. The rhinoceros beetle is a classic case of sexual dimorphism. Plate from Darwin's Descent of Man, male at top, female at bottom In most sexual species the males and females have different equilibrium strategies, due to a difference in relative investment in producing offspring. As formulated in Bateman's principle, females have a greater initial investment in producing offspring (pregnancy in mammals or the production of the egg in birds and reptiles), and this difference in initial investment creates differences in variance in expected reproductive success and bootstraps the sexual selection processes. Classic examples of reversed sex-role species include the pipefish, and Wilson's phalarope. Also, unlike a female, a male (except in monogamous species) has some uncertainty about whether or not he is the true parent of a child, and so is less interested in spending his energy helping to raise offspring that may or may not be related to him. As a result of these factors, males are typically more willing to mate than females, and so females are typically the ones doing the choosing (except in cases of forced copulations, which can occur in certain species of primates, ducks, and others). The effects of sexual selection are thus held to typically be more pronounced in males than in females. Differences in secondary sexual characteristics between males and females of a species are referred to as sexual dimorphisms. These can be as subtle as a size difference (sexual size dimorphism, often abbreviated as SSD) or as extreme as horns and colour patterns. Sexual dimorphisms abound in nature. Examples include the possession of antlers by only male deer, the brighter coloration of many male birds in comparison with females of the same species, or even more distinct differences in basic morphology, such as the drastically increased eye-span of the male stalk-eyed fly. The peacock, with its elaborate and colourful tail feathers, which the peahen lacks, is often referred to as perhaps the most extraordinary example of a dimorphism. Male and female black-throated blue warblers and Guianan cock-of-the-rocks also differ radically in their plumage. Early naturalists even believed the females to be a separate species. The largest sexual size dimorphism in vertebrates is the shell dwelling cichlid fish Neolamprologus callipterus in which males are up to 30 times the size of females. Many other fish such as guppies also exhibit sexual dimorphism. Extreme sexual size dimorphism, with females larger than males, is quite common in spiders and birds of prey.


In different taxa[edit] SEM image of lateral view of a love dart of the land snail Monachoides vicinus. The scale bar is 500 μm (0.5 mm). Sexual selection in birds - mammals - humans -scaled reptiles - amphibians - insects - spiders - major histocompatibility complex Human spermatozoa can reach 250 million in a single ejaculation Sexual selection has been observed to occur in plants, animals and fungi.[23] In certain hermaphroditic snail and slug species of molluscs the throwing of love darts is a form of sexual selection.[24] Certain male insects of the lepidoptera order of insects cement the vaginal pores of their females.[25] A male bed bug (Cimex lectularius) traumatically inseminates a female bed bug (top). The female's ventral carapace is visibly cracked around the point of insemination. Today, biologists say that certain evolutionary traits can be explained by intraspecific competition - competition between members of the same species - distinguishing between competition before or after sexual intercourse. Illustration from The Descent of Man showing the tufted coquette Lophornis ornatus: female on left, ornamented male on right Before copulation, intrasexual selection - usually between males - may take the form of male-to-male combat. Also, intersexual selection, or mate choice, occurs when females choose between male mates.[26] Traits selected by male combat are called secondary sexual characteristics (including horns, antlers, etc.), which Darwin described as "weapons", while traits selected by mate (usually female) choice are called "ornaments". Due to their sometimes greatly exaggerated nature, secondary sexual characteristics can prove to be a hindrance to an animal, thereby lowering its chances of survival. For example, the large antlers of a moose are bulky and heavy and slow the creature's flight from predators; they also can become entangled in low-hanging tree branches and shrubs, and undoubtedly have led to the demise of many individuals. Bright colourations and showy ornamenations, such as those seen in many male birds, in addition to capturing the eyes of females, also attract the attention of predators. Some of these traits also represent energetically costly investments for the animals that bear them. Because traits held to be due to sexual selection often conflict with the survival fitness of the individual, the question then arises as to why, in nature, in which survival of the fittest is considered the rule of thumb, such apparent liabilities are allowed to persist. However, one must also consider that intersexual selection can occur with an emphasis on resources that one sex possesses rather than morphological and physiological differences. For example, males of Euglossa imperialis, a non-social bee species, form aggregations of territories considered to be leks, to defend fragrant-rich primary territories. The purpose of these aggregations is only facultative, since the more suitable fragrant-rich sites there are, the more habitable territories there are to inhabit, giving females of this species a large selection of males with whom to potentially mate.[27] After copulation, male–male competition distinct from conventional aggression may take the form of sperm competition, as described by Parker[28] in 1970. More recently, interest has arisen in cryptic female choice,[29] a phenomenon of internally fertilised animals such as mammals and birds, where a female can get rid of a male's sperm without his knowledge. Victorian cartoonists quickly picked up on Darwin's ideas about display in sexual selection. Here he is fascinated by the apparent steatopygia in the latest fashion. Finally, sexual conflict is said to occur between breeding partners,[30] sometimes leading to an evolutionary arms race between males and females. Sexual selection can also occur as a product of pheromone release, such as with the stingless bee, Trigona corvina.[31] Female mating preferences are widely recognized as being responsible for the rapid and divergent evolution of male secondary sexual traits.[32] Females of many animal species prefer to mate with males with external ornaments - exaggerated features of morphology such as elaborate sex organs. These preferences may arise when an arbitrary female preference for some aspect of male morphology — initially, perhaps, a result of genetic drift — creates, in due course, selection for males with the appropriate ornament. One interpretation of this is known as the sexy son hypothesis. Alternatively, genes that enable males to develop impressive ornaments or fighting ability may simply show off greater disease resistance or a more efficient metabolism, features that also benefit females. This idea is known as the good genes hypothesis. Darwin conjectured that heritable traits such as beards and hairlessness in different human populations are results of sexual selection in humans. Geoffrey Miller has hypothesized that many human behaviours not clearly tied to survival benefits, such as humour, music, visual art, verbal creativity, and some forms of altruism, are courtship adaptations that have been favoured through sexual selection. In that view, many human artefacts could be considered subject to sexual selection as part of the extended phenotype, for instance clothing that enhances sexually selected traits. Some argue that the evolution of human intelligence is a sexually selected trait, as it would not confer enough fitness in itself relative to its high maintenance costs.[33]


References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ Cecie Starr (2013). Biology: The Unity & Diversity of Life (Ralph Taggart, Christine Evers, Lisa Starr ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 281.  ^ Vogt, Yngve (January 29, 2014). "Large testicles are linked to infidelity". Phys.org. Retrieved January 31, 2014.  ^ Darwin, Charles; A. R. Wallace (1858). "On the Tendency of Species to form Varieties; and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection" (PDF). Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology. 3: 46–50. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1858.tb02500.x.  ^ Hartfield, Matthew; P. D. Keightley (2012). "Current hypotheses for the evolution of sex and recombinationn" (PDF). Integrative Zoology. 7: 192–209. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4877.2012.00284.x.  ^ a b Population benefits of sexual selection explain the existence of males phys.org May 18, 2015 Report on a study by the University of East Anglia ^ Darwin, Charles (1859). On the Origin of Species (1st edition). Chapter 4, page 88. "And this leads me to say a few words on what I call Sexual Selection. This depends ..." http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&itemID=F373&pageseq=12 ^ Darwin, Charles (1859). On the Origin of Species (1st edition). Chapter 4, page 89. http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&itemID=F373&pageseq=12 ^ Wallace, Alfred Russel (1892). "Note on Sexual Selection (S459: 1892)". Smith, Charles. Retrieved 13 January 2017.  ^ a b c Dawkins, Richard (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. Longman, London. Published in Penguin Books 1988, 1991, and 2006. Chapter 8, Explosions and Spirals. ^ Andersson, M, Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994. ^ Ronald Fisher in a letter to Charles Galton Darwin, 22 November 1932, cited in Fisher, R. A., Bennett, J. H. 1999. The genetical theory of natural selection: A complete variorum edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 308 ^ Lande, R. (1981). "Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits". PNAS. 78 (6): 3721–3725. doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. PMC 319643 . PMID 16593036.  http://www.pnas.org/content/78/6/3721 ^ O'Donald, Peter (1980). Genetic Models of Sexual Selection. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. 250 pp. ^ Miller, Geoffey, The Mating Mind, p.24 ^ Sexual Selection and the Mind ^ Hosken, David J.; House, Clarissa M. (January 2011). "Sexual Selection". Current Biology. 21: R62–R65. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.053.  ^ Moya-Laraño, J. (2007). "Gravity still matters". Functional Ecology. 21: 1178–1181. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01335.x.  ^ Thierry Lodé (2006). "La guerre des sexes chez les animaux " Eds Odile Jacob, Paris. ISBN 2-7381-1901-8 ^ Sexual Selection Costs & Compensations ^ a b Miller, Geoffrey (2000). The Mating Mind. Anchor Books, a division of Random House, Inc. (First Anchor Books Edition, April 2001). New York, NY. Anchor ISBN 0-385-49517-X ^ Gould, Stephen J. (1974). "Origin and Function of 'Bizarre' Structures - Antler Size and Skull Size in 'Irish Elk', Megaloceros giganteus". Evolution. 28 (2): 191–220. doi:10.2307/2407322.  ^ Eberhard, W. G. (1985). Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. ^ Nieuwenhuis, B. P. S. (2012). "Sexual selection in fungi". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 25: 2397–2411. doi:10.1111/jeb.12017.  ^ Tales of two snails: sexual selection and sexual conflict in Lymnaea stagnalis and Helix aspersa Oxford Journals ^ von Byern, Janek; Grunwald, Ingo. Biological Adhesive Systems: From Nature to Technical and Medical Application. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011. p. 124. ISBN 9783709102862.  ^ Campbell, N. A.; J. B. Reece (2005). Biology. Benjamin Cummings. p. 1230. ISBN 0-8053-7146-X.  ^ Kimsey, Lynn Siri (1980). "The behaviour of male orchid bees (Apidae, Hymenoptera, Insecta) and the question of leks". Animal Behaviour. 28 (4): 996–1004. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(80)80088-1.  ^ Parker, Geoffrey A. (1970). "Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects". Biological Reviews. 45: 525–567. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x.  ^ Eberhard, WG. (1996) Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, Princeton University Press. ^ Locke Rowe, Göran Arnvist. (2013) Sexual conflict, Princeton Univ Press.[page needed] ^ Jarau, Stefan; Dambacher, Jochen; Twele, Robert; Aguilar, Ingrid; Francke, Wittko; Ayasse, Manfred (2010). "The Trail Pheromone of a Stingless Bee, Trigona corvina (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini), Varies between Populations". Chemical Senses. 35 (7): 593–601. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjq057. ISSN 0379-864X. PMID 20534775.  ^ Andersson M (1994). Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ.[page needed] ^ PLoS ONE: Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Brain Size in Primates Sources[edit] Andersson, M. (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-00057-3 Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. (2013) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press Lande, C. F. R. (1981). "Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits" (PDF). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78 (6): 3721–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. PMC 319643 . PMID 16593036. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-27.  Cronin, H. (1991) The ant and the peacock: altruism and sexual selection from Darwin to today. Cambridge University Press. Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London. Eberhard, W. G. (1996) Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, Princeton University Press. Fisher, R. A. (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-850440-3, Chapter 6 Memeoid.net Lodé, T. (2006) La guerre des sexes chez les animaux. Eds Odile Jacob. ISBN 2-7381-1901-8 Miller, G. F. (1998) How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In: C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.) Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 87–129 Miller, G. F. (2000) The Mating Mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Heinemann, London. ISBN 0-434-00741-2 Rosenberg, J. & Tunney, R. J. (2008). Human vocabulary use as display. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 538-549


External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Sexual selection. Natural & Sexual Selection Videos by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Sexual Selection: Stanford University The Great Debate: Sexual Selection Intralocus Sexual Conflict Diminishes the Benefits of Sexual Selection A New Interpretation of Natural Beauty and Sexual Selection Review of GF Miller's The Mating Mind Why Sex Evolved "The sexual propaganda theory" "Sexual Selection Theory and Human Reproductive Behaviour " v t e Sociobiology Topics Behavioural genetics Challenge hypothesis Dual inheritance theory Ethology Evolutionary psychology Evolution of morality Evolutionary models of food sharing Group selection Kin recognition Kin selection Male Warrior hypothesis Reciprocal altruism Sexual selection in human evolution Sex and psychology Sociality (Eusociality, Evolution of eusociality, Presociality) Dunbar's number Supporters Anne Campbell Noam Chomsky Richard Dawkins Daniel Dennett Sarah Blaffer Hrdy Steven Pinker Frans de Waal E. O. Wilson Sociobiology: The New Synthesis Robert Wright Opponents Stephen Jay Gould Leon Kamin Richard Lewontin Steven Rose Not in Our Genes Evolutionary biology portal v t e Speciation Basic concepts Species Species problem Reproductive isolation Chronospecies Anagenesis Cladogenesis Modes of speciation Allopatric Peripatric (Founder effect) Parapatric (Cline) Sympatric (Heteropatric) Ecological speciation Hybrid speciation Auxiliary mechanisms Adaptation Assortative mating Reinforcement Selection Sexual selection Paleopolyploidy Polyploidy Punctuated equilibrium Intermediate stages Hybrid Species complex Ring species Haldane's rule v t e Sex Biological terms Sexual dimorphism Male Female Sexual differentiation Feminization Virilization Sex-determination system XY ZW XO Temperature-dependent Haplodiploidy Heterogametic sex Homogametic sex Sex chromosome X chromosome Y chromosome Testis-determining factor Hermaphrodite Sequential hermaphroditism Intersex Sexual reproduction Evolution of sexual reproduction Anisogamy Isogamy Germ cell Reproductive system Sex organ Meiosis Gametogenesis Spermatogenesis Oogenesis Gamete spermatozoon ovum Fertilization External Internal Sexual selection Plant reproduction Fungal reproduction Sexual reproduction in animals Sexual intercourse Human reproduction Sexuality Plant sexuality Animal sexuality Human sexuality Mechanics Differentiation Activity Sex portal Biology portal v t e Evolutionary biology Evolutionary history of life Index of evolutionary biology articles Introduction Outline of evolution Timeline of evolution Evolution Abiogenesis Adaptation Adaptive radiation Cladistics Coevolution Common descent Cospeciation Convergence Divergence Earliest known life forms Evidence of common descent Extinction Event Gene-centered view Homology Last universal common ancestor Macroevolution Microevolution Origin of life Panspermia Parallel evolution Prehistoric Autopsy Speciation Taxonomy Population genetics Biodiversity Gene flow Genetic drift Mutation Natural selection Variation Development Canalisation Evolutionary developmental biology Inversion Modularity Phenotypic plasticity Of taxa Birds origin Brachiopods Cephalopods Dinosaurs Fish Fungi Insects butterflies Life Mammals cats dogs dolphins and whales horses primates humans lemurs sea cows wolves Molluscs Plants Reptiles Spiders Tetrapods Viruses influenza Of organs Cell DNA Flagella Eukaryotes symbiogenesis chromosome endomembrane system mitochondria nucleus plastids In animals eye hair auditory ossicle nervous system brain Of processes Aging Death Programmed cell death Avian flight Biological complexity Cooperation Color vision in primates Emotion Empathy Ethics Eusociality Immune system Metabolism Monogamy Morality Mosaic evolution Multicellularity Sexual reproduction Gamete differentiation/sexes Life cycles/nuclear phases Mating types Sex-determination Snake venom Tempo and modes Gradualism/Punctuated equilibrium/Saltationism Micromutation/Macromutation Uniformitarianism/Catastrophism Speciation Allopatric Anagenesis Catagenesis Cladogenesis Ecological Hybrid Parapatric Peripatric Reinforcement Sympatric History Renaissance and Enlightenment Transmutation of species Charles Darwin On the Origin of Species History of paleontology Transitional fossil Blending inheritance Mendelian inheritance The eclipse of Darwinism Modern synthesis History of molecular evolution Extended evolutionary synthesis Philosophy Darwinism Alternatives to evolution by natural selection Catastrophism Lamarckism Orthogenesis Mutationism Saltationism Structuralism Spandrel Theistic Vitalism Related Biogeography Ecological genetics Molecular evolution Phylogenetics Tree Polymorphism Protocell Systematics Category Commons Portal WikiProject v t e Patterns in nature Patterns Crack Dune Foam Meander Phyllotaxis Soap bubble Symmetry in crystals Quasicrystals in flowers in biology Tessellation Vortex street Wave Widmanstätten pattern Causes Pattern formation Biology Natural selection Camouflage Mimicry Sexual selection Mathematics Chaos theory Fractal Logarithmic spiral Physics Crystal Fluid dynamics Plateau's laws Self-organization People Plato Pythagoras Empedocles Leonardo Fibonacci Liber Abaci Adolf Zeising Ernst Haeckel Joseph Plateau Wilson Bentley D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson On Growth and Form Alan Turing The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis Aristid Lindenmayer Benoît Mandelbrot How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension Related Pattern recognition Emergence Mathematics and art Evolutionary biology portal Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_selection&oldid=815815077" Categories: AestheticsHuman appearanceHuman behaviorHuman sexualitySelectionSexual attractionSexual selectionSexualityFertilityPopulationNatural selectionHidden categories: Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from December 2016Articles needing additional references from December 2016All articles needing additional referencesUse British English from June 2015All articles with unsourced statementsArticles with unsourced statements from April 2017Articles needing additional references from November 2017


Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces ArticleTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata itemCite this page Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages AfrikaansالعربيةবাংলাБългарскиBosanskiCatalàČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiEspañolEsperantoفارسیFrançaisGalego한국어Bahasa IndonesiaÍslenskaItalianoעבריתქართულიMagyarМакедонскиBahasa MelayuNederlands日本語NorskNorsk nynorskPolskiPortuguêsРусскийසිංහලSimple EnglishSlovenčinaSuomiSvenskaTagalogTürkçeУкраїнськаاردوTiếng Việt中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 17 December 2017, at 09:35. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.488","walltime":"0.660","ppvisitednodes":{"value":3886,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":130003,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":6522,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":16,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":5,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":1,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 503.645 1 -total"," 39.70% 199.954 1 Template:Reflist"," 10.69% 53.852 5 Template:Navbox"," 10.68% 53.776 11 Template:Cite_journal"," 10.09% 50.833 4 Template:Fix"," 10.07% 50.699 1 Template:Refimprove"," 9.83% 49.530 6 Template:ISBN"," 9.16% 46.125 2 Template:Ambox"," 8.49% 42.773 3 Template:Cite_book"," 6.69% 33.671 2 Template:Convert"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.210","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":8106327,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1325","timestamp":"20180115043909","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":82,"wgHostname":"mw1211"});});


Sexual_selection - Photos and All Basic Informations

Sexual_selection More Links

Sex SelectionWikipedia:VerifiabilityHelp:Introduction To Referencing With Wiki Markup/1Help:Maintenance Template RemovalEnlargeSexual DimorphismGoldie's Bird-of-paradiseJohn Gerrard KeulemansEnlargeNatural SelectionBiological SexMate ChoiceSexMatingReproductive SuccessPopulationOffspringSexual Selection In FrogsMating CallCharles DarwinAlfred Russel WallaceSpeciationRonald FisherFitness (biology)Sexual DimorphismSecondary Sexual CharacteristicPlumageBirdsBirds Of ParadisePeafowlDeerLionPositive FeedbackFisherian RunawaySexy Son HypothesisFisher's PrincipleSex RatioPlantFungiAsexual ReproductionThe Origin Of SpeciesThe Descent Of Man And Selection In Relation To SexPeahenAlfred Russel WallaceCamouflageBeetleAestheticRonald FisherEnglandStatisticianEvolutionary BiologistThe Genetical Theory Of Natural SelectionSexy Son HypothesisFisher's PrincipleFisherian RunawayPositive FeedbackExponential GrowthGeometric ProgressionEnlargeLong-tailed WidowbirdPositive FeedbackLong-tailed WidowbirdGene ExpressionRichard DawkinsThe Blind WatchmakerLinkage DisequilibriumEnlargeFisherian RunawayEnlargeIrish ElkReproductive SuccessOffspringFitness (biology)Assortative MatingHomogamy (biology)Bateman's PrincipleParental InvestmentZygoteEnlargeMountain GorillaEvolutionary PsychologyHuman Behavioural EcologySociobiologyBiologyEnlargeEnlargeMate ChoiceFlour BeetleHandicap PrincipleAmotz ZahaviRussell LandeW. D. HamiltonDiseaseMarlene ZukTungara FrogPlantWikipedia:Citation NeededCuckoldSperm CompetitionInfanticideInfanticide In PrimatesBeautyWikipedia:Citation NeededSexual ConflictThierry LodéAntagonistic Co-evolutionTailXiphophorusEnlargeProtarchaeopteryxIncisivosaurusCaudipteryxGeoffrey Miller (psychologist)ArchaeopteryxProtarchaeopteryxBirds-of-paradiseIrish ElkPleistoceneSex OrgansWikipedia:Citing SourcesWikipedia:VerifiabilityHelp:Introduction To Referencing With Wiki Markup/1Wikipedia:VerifiabilityHelp:Maintenance Template RemovalSexual DimorphismCourtshipPrimary Sexual CharacteristicsReproductionSecondary Sex CharacteristicEnlargeRhinoceros BeetleSexual DimorphismDescent Of ManMalesFemalesNash EquilibriumPregnancyBirdsReptilesPipefishMonogamousForced CopulationPrimateDuckSexual DimorphismDeerStalk-eyed FlyPeacockPeahenBlack-throated Blue WarblerGuianan Cock-of-the-rockVertebratesShell DwellersCichlidFishNeolamprologus CallipterusGuppySpidersBirds Of PreyEnlargeScanning Electron MicroscopeMonachoides VicinusSexual Selection In BirdsSexual Selection In MammalsSexual Selection In HumansSexual Selection In Scaled ReptilesSexual Selection In AmphibiansSexual Selection In InsectsSexual Selection In SpidersMajor Histocompatibility Complex And Sexual SelectionEnlargeHermaphroditeSnailSlugMolluscaLove DartInsectLepidopteraEnlargeBed BugCarapaceIntraspecific CompetitionSexual IntercourseEnlargeTufted CoquetteSexual IntercourseMate ChoiceSurvival Of The FittestEuglossa ImperialisAggressionSperm CompetitionGeoff ParkerFemale Sperm StorageSpermEnlargeSteatopygiaSexual ConflictEvolutionary Arms RacePheromoneTrigona CorvinaGenetic DriftSexy Son HypothesisImmune SystemMetabolismSexy Son HypothesisHeritabilitySexual Selection In HumansGeoffrey Miller (psychologist)AltruismExtended PhenotypeEvolution Of Human IntelligencePhys.orgDigital Object IdentifierDigital Object IdentifierUniversity Of East AngliaRonald FisherCharles Galton DarwinDigital Object IdentifierPubMed CentralPubMed IdentifierGeoffrey Miller (psychologist)Digital Object IdentifierDigital Object IdentifierInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/2-7381-1901-8International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-385-49517-XDigital Object IdentifierDigital Object IdentifierInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9783709102862International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-8053-7146-XDigital Object IdentifierGeoff ParkerBiological ReviewsDigital Object IdentifierWikipedia:Citing SourcesDigital Object IdentifierInternational Standard Serial NumberPubMed IdentifierWikipedia:Citing SourcesPrinceton University PressInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-691-00057-3Digital Object IdentifierPubMed CentralPubMed IdentifierHelena CroninCambridge University PressCharles DarwinThe Descent Of Man And Selection In Relation To SexRonald FisherThe Genetical Theory Of Natural SelectionInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-19-850440-3Thierry LodéInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/2-7381-1901-8International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-434-00741-2Template:SociobiologyTemplate Talk:SociobiologySociobiologyBehavioural GeneticsChallenge HypothesisDual Inheritance TheoryEthologyEvolutionary PsychologyEvolution Of MoralityEvolutionary Models Of Food SharingGroup SelectionKin RecognitionKin SelectionMale Warrior HypothesisReciprocal AltruismSexual Selection In Human EvolutionSex And PsychologySocialityEusocialityEvolution Of EusocialityPresocialityDunbar's NumberAnne Campbell (academic)Noam ChomskyRichard DawkinsDaniel DennettSarah Blaffer HrdySteven PinkerFrans De WaalE. O. WilsonSociobiology: The New SynthesisRobert Wright (journalist)Stephen Jay GouldLeon KaminRichard LewontinSteven RoseNot In Our GenesPortal:Evolutionary BiologyTemplate:SpeciationTemplate Talk:SpeciationSpeciationSpeciesSpecies ProblemReproductive IsolationChronospeciesAnagenesisCladogenesisAllopatric SpeciationPeripatric SpeciationFounder EffectParapatric SpeciationCline (biology)Sympatric SpeciationHeteropatric SpeciationEcological SpeciationHybrid SpeciationAdaptationAssortative MatingReinforcement (speciation)Selection (biology)PaleopolyploidyPolyploidyPunctuated EquilibriumHybrid (biology)Species ComplexRing SpeciesHaldane's RuleTemplate:Sex (biology)Template Talk:Sex (biology)SexSexual DimorphismMaleFemaleSexual DifferentiationFeminization (biology)VirilizationSex-determination SystemXY Sex-determination SystemZW Sex-determination SystemX0 Sex-determination SystemTemperature-dependent Sex DeterminationHaplodiploidyHeterogametic SexHeterogametic SexAllosomeX ChromosomeY ChromosomeTestis-determining FactorHermaphroditeSequential HermaphroditismIntersexSexual ReproductionEvolution Of Sexual ReproductionAnisogamyIsogamyGerm CellReproductive SystemSex OrganMeiosisGametogenesisSpermatogenesisOogenesisGameteSpermatozoonEgg CellFertilisationExternal FertilizationInternal FertilizationPlant ReproductionMating In FungiSexual Reproduction In AnimalsSexual IntercourseHuman ReproductionHuman SexualityPlant Reproductive MorphologyAnimal Sexual BehaviourHuman SexualityMechanics Of Human SexualitySexual Differentiation In HumansHuman Sexual ActivityPortal:SexualityPortal:BiologyTemplate:EvolutionTemplate Talk:EvolutionEvolutionary BiologyEvolutionary History Of LifeIndex Of Evolutionary Biology ArticlesIntroduction To EvolutionOutline Of EvolutionTimeline Of Evolutionary History Of LifeEvolutionAbiogenesisAdaptationAdaptive RadiationCladisticsCoevolutionCommon DescentCospeciationConvergent EvolutionDivergent EvolutionEarliest Known Life FormsEvidence Of Common DescentExtinctionExtinction EventGene-centered View Of EvolutionHomology (biology)Last Universal Common AncestorMacroevolutionMicroevolutionAbiogenesisPanspermiaParallel EvolutionPrehistoric AutopsySpeciationEvolutionary TaxonomyPopulation GeneticsBiodiversityGene FlowGenetic DriftMutationNatural SelectionGenetic VariationCanalisation (genetics)Evolutionary Developmental BiologyInversion (evolutionary Biology)Modularity (biology)Phenotypic PlasticityTaxonEvolution Of BirdsOrigin Of BirdsEvolution Of BrachiopodsEvolution Of CephalopodsEvolution Of DinosaursEvolution Of FishEvolution Of FungiEvolution Of InsectsEvolution Of ButterfliesEvolutionary History Of LifeEvolution Of MammalsCat GapOrigin Of The Domestic DogEvolution Of CetaceansEvolution Of The HorseEvolution Of PrimatesHuman EvolutionEvolution Of LemursEvolution Of SireniansEvolution Of The WolfEvolution Of MolluscsEvolutionary History Of PlantsEvolution Of ReptilesEvolution Of SpidersEvolution Of TetrapodsViral EvolutionEvolution Of InfluenzaOrgan (anatomy)Evolution Of CellsModels Of DNA EvolutionEvolution Of FlagellaEukaryoteSymbiogenesisChromosomeEndomembrane SystemMitochondrionCell NucleusPlastidEvolution Of The EyeEvolution Of HairEvolution Of Mammalian Auditory OssiclesEvolution Of Nervous SystemsEvolution Of The BrainBiological ProcessEvolution Of AgeingDeathProgrammed Cell DeathOrigin Of Avian FlightEvolution Of Biological ComplexityCo-operation (evolution)Evolution Of Color VisionEvolution Of Color Vision In PrimatesEvolution Of EmotionEmpathyEvolutionary EthicsEvolution Of EusocialityImmune SystemMetabolismMonogamy In AnimalsEvolution Of MoralityMosaic EvolutionEvolution Of MulticellularityEvolution Of Sexual ReproductionAnisogamyBiological Life CycleMating TypeSex-determination SystemEvolution Of Snake VenomTempo And Mode In EvolutionPhyletic GradualismPunctuated EquilibriumSaltation (biology)MicromutationMacromutationUniformitarianismCatastrophismSpeciationAllopatric SpeciationAnagenesisCatagenesis (biology)CladogenesisEcological SpeciationHybrid SpeciationParapatric SpeciationPeripatric SpeciationReinforcement (speciation)Sympatric SpeciationHistory Of Evolutionary ThoughtEvolutionary Ideas Of The Renaissance And EnlightenmentTransmutation Of SpeciesCharles DarwinOn The Origin Of SpeciesHistory Of PaleontologyTransitional FossilBlending InheritanceMendelian InheritanceThe Eclipse Of DarwinismModern Synthesis (20th Century)History Of Molecular EvolutionExtended Evolutionary SynthesisDarwinismAlternatives To Evolution By Natural SelectionCatastrophismLamarckismOrthogenesisMutationismSaltationismStructuralism (biology)Spandrel (biology)Theistic EvolutionVitalismBiogeographyEcological GeneticsMolecular EvolutionPhylogeneticsPhylogenetic TreePolymorphism (biology)ProtocellSystematicsCategory:Evolutionary BiologyPortal:Evolutionary BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary BiologyTemplate:Patterns In NaturePatterns In NatureFractureDuneFoamMeanderPhyllotaxisSoap BubbleSymmetryCrystal SymmetryQuasicrystalsFloral SymmetrySymmetry In BiologyTessellationVortex StreetWaveWidmanstätten PatternPattern FormationBiologyNatural SelectionCamouflageMimicryMathematicsChaos TheoryFractalLogarithmic SpiralPhysicsCrystalFluid DynamicsPlateau's LawsSelf-organizationPlatoPythagorasEmpedoclesLeonardo FibonacciLiber AbaciAdolf ZeisingErnst HaeckelJoseph PlateauWilson BentleyD'Arcy Wentworth ThompsonOn Growth And FormAlan TuringThe Chemical Basis Of MorphogenesisAristid LindenmayerBenoit MandelbrotHow Long Is The Coast Of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity And Fractional DimensionPattern Recognition (psychology)EmergenceMathematics And ArtPortal:Evolutionary BiologyHelp:CategoryCategory:AestheticsCategory:Human AppearanceCategory:Human BehaviorCategory:Human SexualityCategory:SelectionCategory:Sexual AttractionCategory:Sexual SelectionCategory:SexualityCategory:FertilityCategory:PopulationCategory:Natural SelectionCategory:Wikipedia Articles Needing Page Number Citations From December 2016Category:Articles Needing Additional References From December 2016Category:All Articles Needing Additional ReferencesCategory:Use British English From June 2015Category:All Articles With Unsourced StatementsCategory:Articles With Unsourced Statements From April 2017Category:Articles Needing Additional References From November 2017Discussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Content Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer



view link view link view link view link view link