Contents 1 Predecessors 1.1 Veblen (1898) 2 Present state of discussion 3 Evolutionary psychology 4 See also 5 References 6 Further reading 6.1 Journals 7 External links


Predecessors[edit] In the mid-19th century, Karl Marx presented a schema of stages of historical development, by introducing the notion that human nature was not constant and was not determinative of the nature of the social system; on the contrary, he made it a principle that human behavior was a function of the social and economic system in which it occurred. Marx based his theory of economic development on the premise of developing economic systems; specifically, over the course of history superior economic systems would replace inferior ones. Inferior systems were beset by internal contradictions and inefficiencies that make them impossible to survive over the long term. In Marx's scheme, feudalism was replaced by capitalism, which would eventually be superseded by socialism.[10] At approximately the same time, Charles Darwin developed a general framework for comprehending any process whereby small, random variations could accumulate and predominate over time into large-scale changes that resulted in the emergence of wholly novel forms ("speciation"). This was followed shortly after by the work of the American pragmatic philosophers (Peirce, James, Dewey) and the founding of two new disciplines, psychology and anthropology, both of which were oriented toward cataloging and developing explanatory frameworks for the variety of behavior patterns (both individual and collective) that were becoming increasingly obvious to all systematic observers. The state of the world converged with the state of the evidence to make almost inevitable the development of a more "modern" framework for the analysis of substantive economic issues. Veblen (1898)[edit] Thorstein Veblen (1898) coined the term "evolutionary economics" in English. He began his career in the midst of this period of intellectual ferment, and as a young scholar came into direct contact with some of the leading figures of the various movements that were to shape the style and substance of social sciences into the next century and beyond. Veblen saw the need for taking account of cultural variation in his approach; no universal "human nature" could possibly be invoked to explain the variety of norms and behaviors that the new science of anthropology showed to be the rule, rather than the exception. He emphasised the conflict between "industrial" and "pecuniary" or ceremonial values and this Veblenian dichotomy was interpreted in the hands of later writers as the "ceremonial / instrumental dichotomy" (Hodgson 2004); Veblen saw that every culture is materially based and dependent on tools and skills to support the "life process", while at the same time, every culture appeared to have a stratified structure of status ("invidious distinctions") that ran entirely contrary to the imperatives of the "instrumental" (read: "technological") aspects of group life. The "ceremonial" was related to the past, and conformed to and supported the tribal legends; "instrumental" was oriented toward the technological imperative to judge value by the ability to control future consequences. The "Veblenian dichotomy" was a specialized variant of the "instrumental theory of value" due to John Dewey, with whom Veblen was to make contact briefly at the University of Chicago. Arguably the most important works by Veblen include, but are not restricted to, his most famous works (The Theory of the Leisure Class; The Theory of Business Enterprise), but his monograph Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution and the 1898 essay entitled Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science have both been influential in shaping the research agenda for following generations of social scientists. TOLC and TOBE together constitute an alternative construction on the neoclassical marginalist theories of consumption and production, respectively. Both are founded on his dichotomy, which is at its core a valuational principle. The ceremonial patterns of activity are not bound to any past, but to one that generated a specific set of advantages and prejudices that underlie the current institutions. "Instrumental" judgments create benefits according to a new criterion, and therefore are inherently subversive. This line of analysis was more fully and explicitly developed by Clarence E. Ayres of the University of Texas at Austin from the 1920s. A seminal article by Armen Alchian (1950) argued for adaptive success of firms faced with uncertainty and incomplete information replacing profit maximization as an appropriate modeling assumption.[11] Kenneth Boulding was one of the advocates of the evolutionary methods in social science, as is evident from Kenneth Boulding's Evolutionary Perspective. Kenneth Arrow, Ronald Coase and Douglass North are some of the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel winners who are known for their sympathy to the field. More narrowly the works Jack Downie[12] and Edith Penrose[13] offer many insights for those thinking about evolution at the level of the firm in an industry. Joseph Schumpeter, who lived in the first half of 20th century, was the author of the book The Theory of Economic Development (1911, transl. 1934). It is important to note that for the word development he used in his native language, the German word "Entwicklung", which can be translated as development or evolution. The translators of the day used the word "development" from the French "développement", as opposed to "evolution" as this was used by Darwin. (Schumpeter, in his later writings in English as a professor at Harvard, used the word "evolution".) The current term in common use is economic development. In Schumpeter's book he proposed an idea radical for its time: the evolutionary perspective. He based his theory on the assumption of usual macroeconomic equilibrium, which is something like "the normal mode of economic affairs". This equilibrium is being perpetually destroyed by entrepreneurs who try to introduce innovations. A successful introduction of an innovation (i.e. a disruptive technology) disturbs the normal flow of economic life, because it forces some of the already existing technologies and means of production to lose their positions within the economy.[citation needed]


Present state of discussion[edit] One of the major contributions to the emerging field of evolutionary economics has been the publication of An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change by Richard Nelson and Sidney G. Winter. These authors have focused mostly on the issue of changes in technology and routines, suggesting a framework for their analysis. If the change occurs constantly in the economy, then some kind of evolutionary process must be in action, and there has been a proposal that this process is Darwinian in nature. Then, mechanisms that provide selection, generate variation and establish self-replication, must be identified. The authors introduced the term 'steady change' to highlight the evolutionary aspect of economic processes and contrast it with the concept of 'steady state' popular in classical economics.[14] Their approach can be compared and contrasted with the population ecology or organizational ecology approach in sociology: see Douma & Schreuder (2013, chapter 11). Milton Friedman proposed that markets act as major selection vehicles. As firms compete, unsuccessful rivals fail to capture an appropriate market share, go bankrupt and have to exit.[15] The variety of competing firms is both in their products and practices, that are matched against markets. Both products and practices are determined by routines that firms use: standardized patterns of actions implemented constantly. By imitating these routines, firms propagate them and thus establish inheritance of successful practices.[16][17] A general theory of this process has been proposed by Kurt Dopfer, John Foster and Jason Potts as the micro meso macro framework.[18] Economic processes, as part of life processes, are intrinsically evolutionary[19]. From the evolutionary equation that describe life processes, an analytical formula on the main factors of economic processes, such as fixed cost and variable cost, can be derived. The economic return, or competitiveness, of economic entities of different characteristics under different kinds of environment can be calculated.[20] The change of environment causes the change of competitiveness of different economic entities and systems. This is the process of evolution of economic systems. In recent years, evolutionary models have been used to assist decision making in applied settings and find solutions to problems such as optimal product design and service portfolio diversification.[21]


Evolutionary psychology[edit] See also: Behavioral economics and Neuroeconomics A different approach is to apply evolutionary psychology principles to economics which is argued to explain problems such as inconsistencies and biases in rational choice theory. A basic economic concept such as utility may be better viewed as due to preferences that maximized evolutionary fitness in the ancestral environment but not necessarily in the current one. Loss aversion may be explained as being rational when living at subsistence level where a reduction of resources may have meant death and it thus may have been rational to place a greater value on losses than on gains.[9] People are sometimes more cooperative and altruistic than predicted by economic theory which may be explained by mechanisms such as reciprocal altruism and group selection for cooperative behavior. An evolutionary approach may also explain differences between groups such as males being less risk-averse than females since males have more variable reproductive success than females. While unsuccessful risk-seeking may limit reproductive success for both sexes, males may potentially increase their reproductive success much more than females from successful risk-seeking. Frequency-dependent selection may explain why people differ in characteristics such as cooperative behavior with cheating becoming an increasingly less successful strategy as the numbers of cheaters increase.[9] Another argument is that humans have a poor intuitive grasp of the economics of the current environment which is very different from the ancestral environment. The ancestral environment likely had relatively little trade, division of labor, and capital goods. Technological change was very slow, wealth differences were much smaller, and possession of many available resources were likely zero-sum games where large inequalities were caused by various forms of exploitation. Humans therefore may have poor intuitive understanding the benefits of free trade (causing calls for protectionism), the value of capital goods (making the labor theory of value appealing), and may intuitively undervalue the benefits of technological development.[9] There may be a tendency to see the number of available jobs as a zero-sum game with the total number of jobs being fixed which causes people to not realize that minimum wage laws reduce the number of jobs or to believe that an increased number of jobs in other nations necessarily decreases the number of jobs in their own nation. Large income inequality may easily be viewed as due to exploitation rather than as due to individual differences in productivity. This may easily cause poor economic policies, especially since individual voters have few incentives to make the effort of studying societal economics instead of relying on their intuitions since an individual's vote counts for so little and since politicians may be reluctant to take a stand against intuitive views that are incorrect but widely held.[9]


See also[edit] Business and economics portal Behavioral economics Complexity economics Creative destruction Cultural economics EAEPE Ecological model of competition Evolutionary socialism Hypergamy Institutional economics Population dynamics Innovation system Non-equilibrium economics Universal Darwinism Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Giovanni Dosi Robert H. Frank


References[edit] ^ Friedman, D. (1998). Evolutionary economics goes mainstream: A review of the theory of learning in games. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 8(4), 423-432. ^ Geoffrey M. Hodgson (1993) Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back Into Economics, Cambridge and University of Michigan Press. Description and chapter-link preview. ^ Andersen, E.S., 2013. Evolutionary economics: post-Schumpeterian contributions. Routledge. ^ Simandan, D., 2012. Options for moving beyond the canonical model of regional path dependence. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(1), pp.172-178. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01090.x/full ^ Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G., 2002. Evolutionary theorizing in economics. The journal of economic perspectives, 16(2), pp.23-46. ^ Simandan, D., 2012. Options for moving beyond the canonical model of regional path dependence. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(1), pp.172-178. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01090.x/full ^ Daniel Friedman (1998). "On Economic Applications of Evolutionary Game Theory," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 8(1), pp. 15-43. ^ Ulrich Witt (2008). "evolutionary economics." The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition, v. 3, pp. 67-68 Abstract. ^ a b c d e Paul H. Rubin and C. Monica Capra. The evolutionary psychology of economics. In Roberts, S. C. (2011). Roberts, S. Craig, ed. "Applied Evolutionary Psychology". Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199586073.001.0001. ISBN 9780199586073.  ^ Gregory and Stuart. (2005) Comparing Economic Systems in the Twenty-First Century, Seventh Edition, South-Western College Publishing, ISBN 0-618-26181-8 ^ Armen A. Alchian 1950, "Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory," Journal of Political Economy, 58(3), pp. 211-21. ^ Jack Downie (1958) The Competitive Process ^ E. Penrose (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm ^ Steady change ^ Mazzucato, Mariana (2000). Firm Size, Innovation and Market Structure: The Evolution of Market Concentration and Instability. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. ISBN 1-84064-346-3.  ^ Friedman, Milton (1953). Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press. Chapter preview links. ^ Page 251: Jon Elster, Explaining Technical Change : a Case Study in the Philosophy of Science, Second ed. ^ Dopfer, K., Foster, J., Potts, J. (2004). Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 14(3), 263-279 ^ Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G., 2002. Evolutionary theorizing in economics. The journal of economic perspectives, 16(2), pp.23-46. ^ Chen, Jing (2016). The Unity of Science and Economics: A New Foundation of Economic Theory. https://www.springer.com/us/book/9781493934645: Springer.  ^ Baltas, G., Tsafarakis, S., Saridakis, C. & Matsatsinis, N. (2013). Biologically Inspired Approaches to Strategic Service Design: Optimal Service Diversification Through Evolutionary and Swarm Intelligence Models. Journal of Service Research 16 (2), 186-201


Further reading[edit] Aldrich, Howard E., Geoffrey M. Hodgson, David L. Hull, Thorbjørn Knudsen, Joel Mokyr and Viktor J. Vanberg (2008) ‘In Defence of Generalized Darwinism’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(5), October, pp. 577–96. Canterbery, E. Ray (1998) 'The Theory of the Leisure Class and the Theory of Demand', in Warren G. Samuels (editor), The Founding of Institutional Economics (London and New York: Routledge) pp. 139-56. Douma, Sytse & Hein Schreuder (2013). "Economic Approaches to Organizations". 5th edition. London: Pearson. ISBN 9780273735298 Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2004) The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism (London and New York: Routledge). Richard R. Nelson and Sidney G. Winter. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press. Shiozawa, Yoshinori (2004) Evolutionary Economics in the 21st Century: A Manifext, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 1(1), November, pp. 5–47. Sidney G. Winter (1987). "natural selection and evolution," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, v. 3, pp. 614–17. Veblen, Thorstein B. (1898) ‘Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(3), July, pp. 373–97. Madureira, A., den Hartog, F. & Baken, N., "A holonic framework to understand and apply information processes in evolutionary economics: survey and proposal", Netnomics (2016) 17: 157. doi:10.1007/s11066-016-9107-1 (http://rdcu.be/nqEg). Journals[edit] Journal of Economic Issues, sponsored by the Association for Evolutionary Economics. [1] Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Description and article preview links, sponsored by the International Josef Schumpeter Society. Journal of Institutional Economics, sponsored by the European Society for Evolutionary Political Economy. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, sponsored by the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics (Springer). "The Nature of Value: How to invest in the Adaptive economy", book on the economy as an evolutionary system Netnomics (Springer)


External links[edit] Evolutionary economics at Curlie (based on DMOZ) "Evolutionary Economics et al." by Prof. Esben S. Andersen - Aalborg University, Denmark Evolutionary Economics by J.P. Birchall v t e Schools of economic thought Pre-modern Ancient schools Medieval Islamic Scholasticism Early modern Cameralism Mercantilism Physiocrats School of Salamanca Modern American (National) Anarchist Austrian Birmingham Classical English historical French Georgism German historical Lausanne Malthusian Marginalism Marxian Mutualism Neoclassical Neomercantilism Ricardian Socialist 20th and 21st century Behavioral Buddhist Capability approach Carnegie Chicago Circuitism Constitutional Ecological Evolutionary Feminist Freiburg Institutional Keynesian Modern monetary theory Monetarism (Neo-Monetarism) Neo-Keynesian Neo-Malthusian Neo-Marxian Neo-Ricardian New classical New institutional New Keynesian Organizational Post-Keynesian Public choice Regulation Saltwater/freshwater Stockholm Structuralist Supply-side Thermoeconomics Virginia Related History of economic thought History of macroeconomic thought Economics Mainstream economics Heterodox economics Post-autistic economics Degrowth World-systems theory Economic systems Authority control NDL: 01142321 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolutionary_economics&oldid=809822375" Categories: Innovation economicsSchools of economic thoughtDichotomiesHidden categories: Articles needing additional references from September 2008All articles needing additional referencesAll articles with unsourced statementsArticles with unsourced statements from May 2012Articles with unsourced statements from July 2011Articles with DMOZ links


Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces ArticleTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata itemCite this page Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version Languages العربيةČeštinaDeutschEestiFrançaisעבריתNederlands日本語PolskiPortuguêsСрпски / srpski中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 11 November 2017, at 17:28. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.232","walltime":"0.324","ppvisitednodes":{"value":1618,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":48941,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":2090,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":16,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":3,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":1,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 261.428 1 -total"," 31.51% 82.376 1 Template:Reflist"," 17.38% 45.426 1 Template:Refimprove"," 15.27% 39.908 1 Template:Economics_sidebar"," 14.12% 36.905 1 Template:Sidebar"," 12.23% 31.977 1 Template:Cite_journal"," 11.37% 29.733 2 Template:Citation_needed"," 11.12% 29.062 1 Template:Ambox"," 10.44% 27.292 2 Template:ISBN"," 9.69% 25.332 2 Template:Fix"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.088","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":3481249,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1330","timestamp":"20180113024217","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":404,"wgHostname":"mw1330"});});


Evolutionary_economics - Photos and All Basic Informations

Evolutionary_economics More Links

Wikipedia:VerifiabilityHelp:Introduction To Referencing With Wiki Markup/1Help:Maintenance Template RemovalEconomicsSupply And DemandDemandIndex Of Economics ArticlesOutline Of EconomicsCategory:EconomicsHistory Of Economic ThoughtEconomic HistorySchools Of Economic ThoughtMicroeconomicsMacroeconomicsEconomic MethodologyHeterodox EconomicsJEL Classification CodesEconometricsEconomic GrowthEconomic SystemExperimental EconomicsMathematical EconomicsGame TheoryPost-scarcity EconomyMarket (economics)National AccountsAgricultural EconomicsBehavioral EconomicsBusiness EconomicsComputational EconomicsCultural EconomicsDemographic EconomicsDevelopment EconomicsEconomics Of DigitizationEcological EconomicsEducation EconomicsEngineering EconomicsEnvironmental EconomicsExpeditionary EconomicsEconomic GeographyHealth EconomicsIndustrial OrganizationInformation EconomicsInternational EconomicsKnowledge EconomyLabour EconomicsLaw And EconomicsManagerial EconomicsMonetary EconomicsFinancial EconomicsNatural Resource EconomicsOrganizational EconomicsPersonnel EconomicsPublic EconomicsWelfare EconomicsRegional ScienceRural EconomicsService EconomySocioeconomicsUrban EconomicsWelfareCategory:Economics ListsList Of EconomistsList Of Important Publications In EconomicsList Of Economics JournalsGlossary Of EconomicsPortal:Business And EconomicsTemplate:Economics SidebarTemplate Talk:Economics SidebarMainstream EconomicsHeterodox EconomicsEconomicsEvolutionary BiologyMainstream EconomicsInterdependencyCompetitionEconomic GrowthStructural ChangeResource ConstraintAdaptive Market HypothesisMainstream EconomicsScarcityRational AgentRational ChoiceExercise (mathematics)Mathematical OptimizationComplexity EconomicsWikipedia:Citation NeededBounded RationalityEvolutionary Game TheoryEvolutionCharles DarwinNon-equilibrium EconomicsNatural ScienceTeleologyEvolutionary PsychologyRational Choice TheoryUtilityFitness (biology)Karl MarxHuman NatureEconomic SystemInefficiencyFeudalismCapitalismSocialismCharles DarwinRandom VariationSpeciationCharles Sanders PeirceWilliam JamesJohn DeweyPsychologyAnthropologyBehaviorThorstein VeblenSocial ScienceVeblenian DichotomyInstrumentalismUniversity Of ChicagoThe Theory Of The Leisure ClassThe Theory Of Business EnterpriseSocial ScientistClarence E. AyresUniversity Of Texas At AustinArmen AlchianProfit MaximizationKenneth BouldingKenneth Boulding's Evolutionary PerspectiveKenneth ArrowRonald CoaseDouglass NorthBank Of Sweden Prize In Economic Sciences In Memory Of Alfred NobelJack DownieEdith PenroseJoseph SchumpeterEconomic DevelopmentMacroeconomicsEconomic EquilibriumEntrepreneurInnovationDisruptive TechnologyWikipedia:Citation NeededRichard R. Nelson (economist)Sidney G. WinterTechnologyBusiness ProcessDarwinismSelection (biology)Genetic VariationSelf-replicationSteady ChangeSteady StateClassical EconomicsPopulation EcologyOrganizational EcologyMilton FriedmanMarket (economics)CorporationMarket ShareBankruptBehavioral EconomicsNeuroeconomicsEvolutionary PsychologyRational Choice TheoryUtilityFitness (biology)Loss AversionReciprocal AltruismGroup SelectionReproductive SuccessFrequency-dependent SelectionTradeDivision Of LaborCapital GoodZero-sumFree TradeProtectionismLabor Theory Of ValueMinimum WageIncome InequalityProductivityPortal:Business And EconomicsBehavioral EconomicsComplexity EconomicsCreative DestructionCultural EconomicsEAEPEEcological Model Of CompetitionScientific SocialismHypergamyInstitutional EconomicsPopulation DynamicsInnovation SystemNon-equilibrium EconomicsUniversal DarwinismEvolutionary And Institutional Economics ReviewGiovanni DosiRobert H. FrankGeoffrey HodgsonThe New Palgrave Dictionary Of EconomicsDigital Object IdentifierInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780199586073International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-618-26181-8Steady ChangeMariana MazzucatoInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/1-84064-346-3Milton FriedmanEssays In Positive EconomicsJon ElsterAldrich, Howard E.Douma, SytseHein SchreuderInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/9780273735298Geoffrey HodgsonRichard R. Nelson (economist)Sidney G. WinterThorstein B. VeblenDMOZTemplate:Schools Of Economic ThoughtTemplate Talk:Schools Of Economic ThoughtSchools Of Economic ThoughtAncient Economic ThoughtIslamic Economic JurisprudenceScholasticismCameralismMercantilismPhysiocracySchool Of SalamancaAmerican School (economics)Anarchist EconomicsAustrian SchoolBirmingham School (economics)Classical EconomicsEnglish Historical School Of EconomicsFrench Liberal SchoolGeorgismHistorical School Of EconomicsLausanne SchoolMalthusianismMarginalismMarxian EconomicsMutualism (economic Theory)Neoclassical EconomicsNeomercantilismRicardian EconomicsSocialist EconomicsBehavioral EconomicsBuddhist EconomicsCapability ApproachCarnegie SchoolChicago School Of EconomicsMonetary Circuit TheoryConstitutional EconomicsEcological EconomicsFeminist EconomicsFreiburg SchoolInstitutional EconomicsKeynesian EconomicsModern Monetary TheoryMonetarismMarket MonetarismNeo-Keynesian EconomicsNeo-Malthusian EconomicsNeo-Marxian EconomicsNeo-RicardianismNew Classical MacroeconomicsNew Institutional EconomicsNew Keynesian EconomicsOrganizational EconomicsPost-Keynesian EconomicsPublic ChoiceRegulation SchoolSaltwater And Freshwater EconomicsStockholm School (economics)Structuralist EconomicsSupply-side EconomicsThermoeconomicsVirginia School Of Political EconomyHistory Of Economic ThoughtHistory Of Macroeconomic ThoughtEconomicsMainstream EconomicsHeterodox EconomicsPost-autistic EconomicsDegrowthWorld-systems TheoryEconomic SystemsHelp:Authority ControlNational Diet LibraryHelp:CategoryCategory:Innovation EconomicsCategory:Schools Of Economic ThoughtCategory:DichotomiesCategory:Articles Needing Additional References From September 2008Category:All Articles Needing Additional ReferencesCategory:All Articles With Unsourced StatementsCategory:Articles With Unsourced Statements From May 2012Category:Articles With Unsourced Statements From July 2011Category:Articles With DMOZ LinksDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Content Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer