Contents 1 Life 1.1 Politics 1.2 "First World War" 2 Research 3 Polygenism and racial theory 3.1 Asia hypothesis 4 Embryology and recapitulation theory 4.1 Darwin, Naturphilosophie and Lamarck 4.2 Embryological drawings 4.3 Controversy 5 Awards and honors 6 Publications 6.1 Monographs 6.2 Challenger reports 6.3 Books on biology and its philosophy 6.4 Travel books 7 See also 8 Footnotes 9 Sources 10 External links

Life[edit] Ernst Haeckel was born on 16 February 1834, in Potsdam (then part of Prussia).[3] In 1852, Haeckel completed studies at the Domgymnasium, the cathedral high school of Merseburg.[3] He then studied medicine in Berlin and Würzburg, particularly with Albert von Kölliker, Franz Leydig, Rudolf Virchow (with whom he later worked briefly as assistant), and with the anatomist-physiologist Johannes Peter Müller (1801–1858).[3] Together with Hermann Steudner he attended botany lectures in Würzburg. In 1857, Haeckel attained a doctorate in medicine, and afterwards he received the license to practice medicine. The occupation of physician appeared less worthwhile to Haeckel, after contact with suffering patients.[3] Haeckel studied under Karl Gegenbaur for three years, earning a habilitation in comparative anatomy in 1861, before becoming a professor of zoology at the University of Jena, where he remained for 47 years, from 1862 to 1909. Between 1859 and 1866, Haeckel worked on many phyla such radiolarians, poriferans (sponges) and annelids (segmented worms).[4] During a trip to the Mediterranean, Haeckel named nearly 150 new species of radiolarians.[4] From 1866 to 1867, Haeckel made an extended journey to the Canary Islands with Hermann Fol and during this period, met with Charles Darwin, in 1866 at Down House in Kent, Thomas Huxley and Charles Lyell.[clarification needed][3] In 1867, he married Agnes Huschke. Their son Walter was born in 1868, their daughters Elizabeth in 1871 and Emma in 1873.[3] In 1869, he traveled as a researcher to Norway, in 1871 to Croatia (lived on the island of Hvar in a monastery),[5] and in 1873 to Egypt, Turkey, and to Greece.[3] Haeckel retired from teaching in 1909, and in 1910 he withdrew from the Evangelical Church of Prussia.[3] On the occasion of his 80th birthday celebration, he was presented with a two volume work, entitled Was wir Ernst Haeckel verdanken (What We Owe to Ernst Haeckel), edited at the request of the German Monistenbund by Heinrich Schmidt of Jena.[6][7] Haeckel's wife, Agnes, died in 1915, and Haeckel became substantially frailer, with a broken leg (thigh) and broken arm.[3] He sold his "Villa Medusa" in Jena in 1918 to the Carl Zeiss foundation, and it presently contains a historic library.[3] Haeckel died on 9 August 1919. Haeckel was an atheist.[8] Politics[edit] Haeckel's political beliefs were influenced by his affinity for the German Romantic movement coupled with his acceptance of a form of Lamarckism. Rather than being a strict Darwinian, Haeckel believed that the characteristics of an organism were acquired through interactions with the environment and that ontogeny reflected phylogeny. He believed the social sciences to be instances of "applied biology", and that phrase was picked up and used for Nazi propaganda.[4] In 1905, Haeckel founded a group called the Monist League (Deutscher Monistenbund) to promote his religious and political beliefs. This group lasted until 1933 and included such notable members as Wilhelm Ostwald, Georg von Arco, Helene Stöcker and Walter Arthur Berendsohn.[9] "First World War"[edit] Haeckel was the first person known to use the term "First World War". Shortly after the start of the war Haeckel wrote: There is no doubt that the course and character of the feared "European War"...will become the first world war in the full sense of the word. — Indianapolis Star, 20 September 1914[10] The "European War" became known as "The Great War", and it was not until 1920, in the book "The First World War 1914–1918" by Charles à Court Repington, that the term "First World War" was used as the official name for the conflict.

Research[edit] Haeckel was a zoologist, an accomplished artist and illustrator, and later a professor of comparative anatomy. Although Haeckel's ideas are important to the history of evolutionary theory, and although he was a competent invertebrate anatomist most famous for his work on radiolaria, many speculative concepts that he championed are now considered incorrect. For example, Haeckel described and named hypothetical ancestral microorganisms that have never been found. He was one of the first to consider psychology as a branch of physiology. He also proposed the kingdom Protista[3] in 1866. His chief interests lay in evolution and life development processes in general, including development of nonrandom form, which culminated in the beautifully illustrated Kunstformen der Natur (Art forms of nature). Haeckel did not support natural selection, rather believing in Lamarckism.[11] Embryology theories of Ernst Haeckel and Karl Ernst von Baer compared Haeckel advanced a version of the earlier recapitulation theory previously set out by Étienne Serres in the 1820s and supported by followers of Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire including Robert Edmond Grant.[12] It proposed a link between ontogeny (development of form) and phylogeny (evolutionary descent), summed up by Haeckel in the phrase "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny". His concept of recapitulation has been refuted in the form he gave it (now called "strong recapitulation"), in favour of the ideas first advanced by Karl Ernst von Baer. The strong recapitulation hypothesis views ontogeny as repeating forms of the ancestors, while weak recapitulation means that what is repeated (and built upon) is the ancestral embryonic development process.[13] Haeckel supported the theory with embryo drawings that have since been shown to be oversimplified and in part inaccurate, and the theory is now considered an oversimplification of quite complicated relationships. Haeckel introduced the concept of heterochrony, the change in timing of embryonic development over the course of evolution. Haeckel was a flamboyant figure, who sometimes took great, non-scientific leaps from available evidence. For example, at the time when Darwin published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (1859), Haeckel postulated that evidence of human evolution would be found in the Dutch East Indies (now Indonesia). At that time, no remains of human ancestors had yet been identified. He described these theoretical remains in great detail and even named the as-yet unfound species, Pithecanthropus alalus, and instructed his students such as Richard and Oskar Hertwig to go and find it. One student did find some remains: a Dutchman named Eugène Dubois searched the East Indies from 1887 to 1895, discovering the remains of Java Man in 1891, consisting of a skullcap, thighbone, and a few teeth. These remains are among the oldest hominid remains ever found. Dubois classified Java Man with Haeckel's Pithecanthropus label, though they were later reclassified as Homo erectus. Some scientists of the day suggested[14] Dubois' Java Man as a potential intermediate form between modern humans and the common ancestor we share with the other great apes. The current consensus of anthropologists is that the direct ancestors of modern humans were African populations of Homo erectus (possibly Homo ergaster), rather than the Asian populations exemplified by Java Man and Peking Man. (Ironically, a new human species, Homo floresiensis, a dwarf human type, has recently been discovered in the island of Flores).

Polygenism and racial theory[edit] The creationist polygenism of Samuel George Morton and Louis Agassiz, which presented human races as separately created species, was rejected by Charles Darwin, who argued for the monogenesis of the human species and the African origin of modern humans. In contrast to most of Darwin's supporters, Haeckel put forward a doctrine of evolutionary polygenism based on the ideas of the linguist August Schleicher, in which several different language groups had arisen separately from speechless prehuman Urmenschen, which themselves had evolved from simian ancestors. These separate languages had completed the transition from animals to man, and, under the influence of each main branch of languages, humans had evolved – in a kind of Lamarckian use-inheritance – as separate species, which could be subdivided into races. From this, Haeckel drew the implication that languages with the most potential yield the human races with the most potential, led by the Semitic and Indo-Germanic groups, with Berber, Jewish, Greco-Roman and Germanic varieties to the fore.[15] As Haeckel stated:[16] We must mention here one of the most important results of the comparative study of languages, which for the Stammbaum of the species of men is of the highest significance, namely that human languages probably had a multiple or polyphyletic origin. Human language as such probably developed only after the species of speechless Urmenschen or Affenmenschen had split into several species or kinds. With each of these human species, language developed on its own and independently of the others. At least this is the view of Schleicher, one of the foremost authorities on this subject.… If one views the origin of the branches of language as the special and principal act of becoming human, and the species of humankind as distinguished according to their language stem, then one can say that the different species of men arose independently of one another. Haeckel's view can be seen as a forerunner of the views of Carleton Coon, who also believed that human races evolved independently and in parallel with each other. These ideas eventually fell from favour. Haeckel also applied the hypothesis of polygenism to the modern diversity of human groups. He became a key figure in social darwinism and leading proponent of scientific racism, stating for instance:[17] The Caucasian, or Mediterranean man (Homo Mediterraneus), has from time immemorial been placed at the head of all the races of men, as the most highly developed and perfect. It is generally called the Caucasian race, but as, among all the varieties of the species, the Caucasian branch is the least important, we prefer the much more suitable appellation proposed by Friedrich Müller, namely, that of Mediterranese. For the most important varieties of this species, which are moreover the most eminent actors in what is called "Universal History," first rose to a flourishing condition on the shores of the Mediterranean.… This species alone (with the exception of the Mongolian) has had an actual history; it alone has attained to that degree of civilisation which seems to raise men above the rest of nature. Haeckel divided human beings into ten races, of which the Caucasian was the highest and the primitives were doomed to extinction.[18] Haeckel claimed that Negros have stronger and more freely movable toes than any other race which is evidence that Negros are related to apes because when apes stop climbing in trees they hold on to the trees with their toes, Haeckel compared Negros to "four-handed" apes. Haeckel also believed Negros were savages and that Whites were the most civilised.[19] However, Robert J. Richards notes: "Haeckel, on his travels to Ceylon and Indonesia, often formed closer and more intimate relations with natives, even members of the untouchable classes, than with the European colonials."[20] In his Ontology and Phylogeny Harvard paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould wrote: "[Haeckel's] evolutionary racism; his call to the German people for racial purity and unflinching devotion to a "just" state; his belief that harsh, inexorable laws of evolution ruled human civilization and nature alike, conferring upon favored races the right to dominate others . . . all contributed to the rise of Nazism."[21] The Nazi party ideologue Alfred Rosenberg explicitly mentions having read Haeckel in his 1930 book, The Myth of the Twentieth Century.[citation needed] In the same line of thought, historian Daniel Gasman states that Haeckel's ideology stimulated the birth of Fascist ideology in Italy and France.[22] Asia hypothesis[edit] See also: Asian origin of modern humans Haeckel claimed the origin of humanity was to be found in Asia: he believed that Hindustan (Indian Subcontinent) was the actual location where the first humans had evolved. Haeckel argued that humans were closely related to the primates of Southeast Asia and rejected Darwin's hypothesis of Africa.[23][24] Haeckel later claimed that the missing link was to be found on the lost continent of Lemuria located in the Indian Ocean, he believed that Lemuria was the home of the first humans and that Asia was the home of many of the earliest primates, he thus supported that Asia was the cradle of hominid evolution. Haeckel also claimed that Lemuria connected Asia and Africa which allowed the migration of humans to the rest of the world.[25][26] In Haeckel’s book The History of Creation (1884) he included migration routes which he thought the first humans had used outside of Lemuria.

Embryology and recapitulation theory[edit] Illustrations of dog and human embryos, looking almost identical at 4 weeks then differing at 6 weeks, shown above a 6-week turtle embryo and 8-day hen embryo, presented by Haeckel in 1868 as convincing proof of evolution. The pictures of the earliest embryonic stages are now considered inaccurate.[27] Further information: Recapitulation theory When Haeckel was a student in the 1850s he showed great interest in embryology, attending the rather unpopular lectures twice and in his notes sketched the visual aids: textbooks had few illustrations, and large format plates were used to show students how to see the tiny forms under a reflecting microscope, with the translucent tissues seen against a black background. Developmental series were used to show stages within a species, but inconsistent views and stages made it even more difficult to compare different species. It was agreed by all European evolutionists that all vertebrates looked very similar at an early stage, in what was thought of as a common ideal type, but there was a continuing debate from the 1820s between the Romantic recapitulation theory that human embryos developed through stages of the forms of all the major groups of adult animals, literally manifesting a sequence of organisms on a linear chain of being, and Karl Ernst von Baer's opposing view, stated in von Baer's laws of embryology, that the early general forms diverged into four major groups of specialised forms without ever resembling the adult of another species, showing affinity to an archetype but no relation to other types or any transmutation of species. By the time Haeckel was teaching he was able to use a textbook with woodcut illustrations written by his own teacher Albert von Kölliker, which purported to explain human development while also using other mammalian embryos to claim a coherent sequence. Despite the significance to ideas of transformism, this was not really polite enough for the new popular science writing, and was a matter for medical institutions and for experts who could make their own comparisons.[28]:264–267[29] Darwin, Naturphilosophie and Lamarck[edit] Darwin's On the Origin of Species, which made a powerful impression on Haeckel when he read it in 1864, was very cautious about the possibility of ever reconstructing the history of life, but did include a section reinterpreting von Baer's embryology and revolutionising the field of study, concluding that "Embryology rises greatly in interest, when we thus look at the embryo as a picture, more or less obscured, of the common parent-form of each great class of animals." It mentioned von Baer's 1828 anecdote (misattributing it to Louis Agassiz) that at an early stage embryos were so similar that it could be impossible to tell whether an unlabelled specimen was of a mammal, a bird, or of a reptile, and Darwin's own research using embryonic stages of barnacles to show that they are crustaceans, while cautioning against the idea that one organism or embryonic stage is "higher" or "lower", or more or less evolved.[30] Haeckel disregarded such caution, and in a year wrote his massive and ambitious Generelle Morphologie, published in 1866, presenting a revolutionary new synthesis of Darwin's ideas with the German tradition of Naturphilosophie going back to Goethe and with the progressive evolutionism of Lamarck in what he called Darwinismus. He used morphology to reconstruct the evolutionary history of life, in the absence of fossil evidence using embryology as evidence of ancestral relationships. He invented new terms, including ontogeny and phylogeny, to present his evolutionised recapitulation theory that "ontogeny recapitulated phylogeny". The two massive volumes sold poorly, and were heavy going: with his limited understanding of German, Darwin found them impossible to read. Haeckel's publisher turned down a proposal for a "strictly scholarly and objective" second edition.[28]:269–270 Embryological drawings[edit] Haeckel's tree of life Haeckel's aim was a reformed morphology with evolution as the organising principle of a cosmic synthesis unifying science, religion, and art. He was giving successful "popular lectures" on his ideas to students and townspeople in Jena, in an approach pioneered by his teacher Rudolf Virchow. To meet his publisher's need for a popular work he used a student's transcript of his lectures as the basis of his Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte of 1868, presenting a comprehensive presentation of evolution. In the Spring of that year he drew figures for the book, synthesising his views of specimens in Jena and published pictures to represent types. After publication he told a colleague that the images "are completely exact, partly copied from nature, partly assembled from all illustrations of these early stages that have hitherto become known." There were various styles of embryological drawings at that time, ranging from more schematic representations to "naturalistic" illustrations of specific specimens. Haeckel believed privately that his figures were both exact and synthetic, and in public asserted that they were schematic like most figures used in teaching. The images were reworked to match in size and orientation, and though displaying Haeckel's own views of essential features, they support von Baer's concept that vertebrate embryos begin similarly and then diverge. Relating different images on a grid conveyed a powerful evolutionary message. As a book for the general public, it followed the common practice of not citing sources.[28]:270–274 In 1868 Haeckel illustrated von Baer's observation that early embryos of different species could not be told apart by using the same woodcut three times as dog, chick and turtle embryos: he changed this in the next edition. The book sold very well, and while some anatomical experts hostile to Haeckel's evolutionary views expressed some private concerns that certain figures had been drawn rather freely, the figures showed what they already knew about similarities in embryos. The first published concerns came from Ludwig Rütimeyer, a professor of zoology and comparative anatomy at the University of Basel who had placed fossil mammals in an evolutionary lineage early in the 1860s and had been sent a complimentary copy. At the end of 1868 his review in the Archiv für Anthropologie wondered about the claim that the work was "popular and scholarly", doubting whether the second was true, and expressed horror about such public discussion of man's place in nature with illustrations such as the evolutionary trees being shown to non-experts. Though he made no suggestion that embryo illustrations should be directly based on specimens, to him the subject demanded the utmost "scrupulosity and conscientiousness" and an artist must "not arbitrarily model or generalise his originals for speculative purposes" which he considered proved by comparison with works by other authors. In particular, "one and the same, moreover incorrectly interpreted woodcut, is presented to the reader three times in a row and with three different captions as [the] embryo of the dog, the chick, [and] the turtle." He accused Haeckel of "playing fast and loose with the public and with science", and failing to live up to the obligation to the truth of every serious researcher. Haeckel responded with angry accusations of bowing to religious prejudice, but in the second (1870) edition changed the duplicated embryo images to a single image captioned "embryo of a mammal or bird". Duplication using galvanoplastic stereotypes (clichés) was a common technique in textbooks, but not on the same page to represent different eggs or embryos. In 1891 Haeckel made the excuse that this "extremely rash foolishness" had occurred in undue haste but was "bona fide", and since repetition of incidental details was obvious on close inspection, it is unlikely to have been intentional deception.[28]:275–276;282–286 The revised 1870 second edition of 1,500 copies attracted more attention, being quickly followed by further revised editions with larger print runs as the book became a prominent part of the optimistic, nationalist, anticlerical "culture of progress" in Otto von Bismarck's new German Empire. The similarity of early vertebrate embryos became common knowledge, and the illustrations were praised by experts such as Michael Foster of the University of Cambridge. In the introduction to his 1871 The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, Darwin gave particular praise to Haeckel, writing that if Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte "had appeared before my essay had been written, I should probably never have completed it." The first chapter included an illustration: "As some of my readers may never have seen a drawing of an embryo, I have given one of man and another of a dog, at about the same early stage of development, carefully copied from two works of undoubted accuracy" with a footnote citing the sources and noting that "Häckel has also given analogous drawings in his Schöpfungsgeschichte." The fifth edition of Haeckel's book appeared in 1874, with its frontispiece a heroic portrait of Haeckel himself, replacing the previous controversial image of the heads of apes and humans.[28]:285–288[31] 1874 illustration from Anthropogenie showing "very early", "somewhat later" and "still later" stages of embryos of fish (F), salamander (A), turtle (T), chick (H), pig (S), cow (R), rabbit (K), and human (M) Controversy[edit] Later in 1874, Haeckel's simplified embryology textbook Anthropogenie made the subject into a battleground over Darwinism aligned with Bismarck's Kulturkampf ("culture struggle") against the Catholic Church. Haeckel took particular care over the illustrations, changing to the leading zoological publisher Wilhelm Engelmann of Leipzig and obtaining from them use of illustrations from their other textbooks as well as preparing his own drawings including a dramatic double page illustration showing "early", "somewhat later" and "still later" stages of 8 different vertebrates. Though Haeckel's views had attracted continuing controversy, there had been little dispute about the embryos and he had many expert supporters, but Wilhelm His revived the earlier criticisms and introduced new attacks on the 1874 illustrations.[32] Others joined in, both expert anatomists and Catholic priests and supporters were politically opposed to Haeckel's views.[28]:288–296 While it has been widely claimed that Haeckel was charged with fraud by five professors and convicted by a university court at Jena, there does not appear to be an independently verifiable source for this claim.[33] Recent analyses (Richardson 1998, Richardson and Keuck 2002) have found that some of the criticisms of Haeckel's embryo drawings were legitimate, but others were unfounded.[34][35] There were multiple versions of the embryo drawings, and Haeckel rejected the claims of fraud. It was later said that "there is evidence of sleight of hand" on both sides of the feud between Haeckel and Wilhelm His.[36] Robert J. Richards, in a paper published in 2008, defends the case for Haeckel, shedding doubt against the fraud accusations based on the material used for comparison with what Haeckel could access at the time.[37] The controversy involves several different issues (see more details at: recapitulation theory).

Awards and honors[edit] He was awarded the title of Excellency by Kaiser Wilhelm II in 1907[38] and the Linnean Society of London's prestigious Darwin-Wallace Medal in 1908. In the United States, Mount Haeckel, a 13,418 ft (4,090 m) summit in the Eastern Sierra Nevada, overlooking the Evolution Basin, is named in his honour, as is another Mount Haeckel, a 2,941 m (9,649 ft) summit in New Zealand; and the asteroid 12323 Haeckel.

Publications[edit] Kunstformen — plate 72: Muscinae Kunstformen — plate 96: Chaetopoda Medusa of Aeginura grimaldii (bottom view) Darwin's 1859 book On the Origin of Species had immense popular influence, but although its sales exceeded its publisher's hopes it was a technical book rather than a work of popular science: long, difficult and with few illustrations. One of Haeckel's books did a great deal to explain his version of "Darwinism" to the world. It was a bestselling, provocatively illustrated book in German, titled Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte, published in Berlin in 1868, and translated into English as The History of Creation in 1876. It was frequently reprinted until 1926. Haeckel argued that human evolution consisted of precisely 22 phases, the 21st – the "missing link" — being a halfway step between apes and humans. He even formally named this missing link Pithecanthropus alalus, translated as "ape man without speech." Haeckel's literary output was extensive, including many books, scientific papers, and illustrations.[39] Monographs[edit] Radiolaria (1862) Siphonophora (1869) Monera (1870) Calcareous Sponges (1872) Challenger reports[edit] Deep-Sea Medusae (1881) Siphonophora (1888) Deep-Sea Keratosa (1889) Radiolaria (1887) Books on biology and its philosophy[edit] 'Monophyletischer Stambaum der Organismen' from 'Generelle Morphologie der Organismen' (1866) with the three branches Plantae, Protista, Animalia. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen : allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie. (1866) Berlin Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte (1868); in English The History of Creation (1876; 6th ed.: New York, D. Appleton and Co., 1914, 2 volumes) Freie Wissenschaft und freie Lehre (1877), in English, Freedom in Science and Teaching Die systematische Phylogenie (1894) — "Systematic Phylogeny" Anthropogenie: oder, Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen ("Anthropogeny: Or, the Evolutionary History of Man", 1874 Die Welträthsel (1895–1899), also spelled Die Welträtsel — in English The Riddle of the Universe, 1901 Über unsere gegenwärtige Kenntnis vom Ursprung des Menschen (1898) — in English The Last Link, 1898 Der Kampf um den Entwickelungsgedanken (1905) — in English Last Words on Evolution, 1906 Die Lebenswunder (1904) — in English The Wonders of Life Kristallseelen : Studien über das anorganische Leben (1917) Travel books[edit] Indische Reisebriefe (1882) — Travel notes of India Aus Insulinde: Malayische Reisebriefe (1901) — Travel notes of Malaysia Kunstformen der Natur (1904) — Art forms of Nature, Digital Edition (1924) Wanderbilder (1905) — "Travel Images" A visit to Ceylon For a fuller list of works of and about Haeckel, see his entry in the German Wikisource. The standard author abbreviation Haeckel is used to indicate this person as the author when citing a botanical name.[40]

See also[edit] Dysteleology Embryology Haeckelites Haeckel's Tale Heinrich Schmidt (philosopher) Karl Blossfeldt List of wildlife artists Proteus (2004 film)

Footnotes[edit] ^ "Ernst Haeckel – Britannica Concise" (biography) Encyclopædia Britannica Concise, 2006, Concise. webpage: CBritannica-Haeckel Archived 11 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine.. ^ Freedom in Science and Teaching. German 1877, English 1879, ISBN 1-4102-1175-4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "Ernst Haeckel" (article),German Wikipedia, 26 October 2006, webpage: DE-Wiki-Ernst-Haeckel: last paragraph of "Leben" (Life) section.[better source needed] ^ a b c "Ernst Haeckel" (biography), UC Berkeley, 2004, webpage: BerkeleyEdu-Haeckel. ^ New York Times Haeckel Again Honored in Spite of Himself on his 80th Birthday, published: 22 February 1914 ^ Felden, Emil (1914). "Felden Pastor an St. Martini Bremen" [Pastor of St. Martini Church, Bremen, Germany]. In Schmidt, Heinrich. Was wir Ernst Haeckel Verdanken (What We Owe to Ernst Haeckel): Ein buch der Verehrung und Dankbarkeit (in German). 2. Deutscher Monistenbund. Leipzig: Verlag Unesma G.m.b.H. pp. 125–128. testimony of Emil Felden in Was wir Ernst Haeckel Verdanken, vol. ii, p. 125.  ^ Carus, Paul (1914). The Open Court. Open Court Publishing Company. p. 385. PROFESSOR Ernst Haeckel's celebration of his 80th birthday, ...on this occasion we note a work of two stately volumes, entitled Was wir Ernst Haeckel verdanken, edited at the request of the German Monistenbund by Heinrich Schmidt of Jena. (Image of p. 385 at Google Books)  ^ "KAISER HONORS HAECKEL.; Bestows the Title of Excellency on the Famous Atheist." The New York Times. The New York Times, 09 Mar. 1907. Web. 13 Apr. 2017. <>. ^ Health, Race and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism by Paul Weindling, Cambridge University Press, 1993., pgs. 46, 250 ^ Fred R. Shapiro, ed. (2006). The Yale Book of Quotations. Yale University Press. p. 329. ISBN 978-0-300-10798-2. Retrieved 2008-10-08.  ^ Ruse, M. 1979. The Darwinian Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ^ Desmond 1989, pp. 53–53, 86–88, 337–340 ^ Richardson and Keuck, (Biol. Review (2002), 77, pp. 495–528) show that it is a simplification to suppose that Haeckel held the recapitulation theory in its strong form. They quote Haeckel as saying "If [recapitulation] was always complete, it would be a very easy task to construct whole phylogeny on the basis of ontogeny. … There is certainly, even now, a number of lower vertebrate animals (e.g. some Anthozoa and Vermes) where we are authorised to interpret each embryological form directly as the historical representation or portrait-like silhouette of an extinct ancestral form. But in a great majority of animals, including man, this is not possible because the infinitely varied conditions of existence have led the embryonic forms themselves to be changed and to partly lose their original condition (Haeckel, 1903: pp. 435–436)" ^ The red ape: orang-utans and human origins, Jeffrey H. Schwartz ^ Richards, Robert W. (2008). The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 259–260. ISBN 0-226-71214-1.  ^ Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte (1868), p. 511; quoted after Robert J. Richards, "The linguistic creation of man: Charles Darwin, August Schleicher, Ernst Haeckel, and the Missing Link in Nineteenth-Century Evolutionary Theory".[1] ^ The History of Creation, 6th edition (1914), volume 2, page 429. ^ John P. Jackson, Nadine M. Weidman Race, Racism, and science: social impact and interaction, Rutgers University Press, 2005, p. 87 ^ Gustav Jahoda, Images of savages: ancients [sic] roots of modern prejudice in Western culture, 1999, p. 83 ^ Robert J. Richards, "Myth 19: That Darwin and Haeckel Were Complicit in Nazi Biology," in Ronald L. Numbers, ed., Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths About Science and Religioin, Harvard University Press, 2009, p. 174., ^ Gould, S.J. Ontogeny and Phylogeny Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press pp. 77-78 ^ Daniel Gasman (1998). Haeckel's Monism and the Birth of Fascist Ideology. Volume 33 of Studies in Modern European History. Peter Lang Pub Incorporated. ISSN 0893-6897. ISBN 978-0-8204-4108-5 ^ Prehistoric past: The four billion year history of life on earth, Douglas Palmer, p. 43 ^ Human evolution, a guide to the debates, Brian Regal, p. 73-75 ^ Asian Paleoanthropology: From Africa to China and beyond, Christopher J Norton, David R Braun, p. 4 ^ From here to Eternity: Ernst Haeckel and the scientific faith, Mario A. Di Gregorio p. 480 ^ Richardson MK, Hanken J, Selwood L, Wright GM, Richards RJ, Pieau C, Raynaud A (1998). "Letters". Science. 280 (5366): 983, 985–6. doi:10.1126/science.280.5366.983c. PMID 9616084.  ^ a b c d e f Hopwood, N (June 2006). "Pictures of evolution and charges of fraud: Ernst Haeckel's embryological illustrations" (PDF). Isis; an international review devoted to the history of science and its cultural influences. 97 (2): 260–301. doi:10.1086/504734. PMID 16892945. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 October 2013.  ^ Darwin & Costa 2011, p. 450 ^ Darwin 1859, pp. 439–450 Darwin & Costa 2011, pp. 439–450 ^ Darwin 1871, pp. 4, 14–17 ^ Wilhelm His: Unsere Körperform und das physiologische Problem ihrer Entstehung. F.C.W. Vogel, Leipzig 1875. ^ Richards, Robert J. (2005), "Ernst Haeckel and the Struggles over Evolution and Religion", Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology, Universitätsverlag Göttingen, 10: 89–115, ISBN 978-3-938616-39-0, retrieved 2016-02-22  ^ Michael K. Richardson. 1998. "Haeckel's embryos continued." Science 281:1289, quoted in webpage Re: Ontogeny and phylogeny Archived 14 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine.: A Letter from Richard Bassetti; Editor's note. ^ "While some criticisms of the drawings are legitimate, others are more tendentious", Richardson and Keuck "Haeckel's ABC of evolution and development", Biol. Rev. (2002), 77, pp. 495–528. Quoted from p. 495. ^ Richardson & Keuck 2001. See for example, their Fig. 7, showing His's drawing of the forelimb of a deer embryo developing a clef, compared with a similar drawing (Sakurai, 1906) showing the forelimb initially developing as a digital plate with rays. Richardson & Keuck say "Unfortunately His's embryos are mostly at later stages than the nearly identical early stage embryos illustrated by Haeckel [top row of Haeckel's drawing]. Thus they do not inform the debate and may themselves be disingenuous.", p. 518. ^ "Haeckel's embryos: fraud not proven", Robert J. Richards, Biol Philos (2009) 24:147–154 DOI 10.1007/s10539-008-9140-z [2] ^ "Kaiser Honors Haeckel". The New York Times. 9 March 1907. Retrieved 15 July 2012.  ^ "Ernst Haeckel". WorldCat. Retrieved 4 June 2017.  ^ IPNI.  Haeckel. 

Sources[edit] Darwin, Charles (1859). On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray.  Darwin, Charles; Costa, James T. (2011). The Annotated Origin. Harvard: Harvard University Press.  Darwin, Charles (1871). The Descent of Man. London: John Murray.  Desmond, Adrian J. (1989). The politics of evolution: morphology, medicine, and reform in radical London. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-14374-0. 

External links[edit] Find more aboutErnst Haeckelat Wikipedia's sister projects Media from Wikimedia Commons Texts from Wikisource Data from Wikidata E. Haeckel: Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte 1868 (front page of 1st edition, German) E. Haeckel: Die Welträthsel 1899 (front page of 1st edition, German) University of California, Berkeley — biography Ernst Haeckel – Evolution's controversial artist. A slide-show essay Kunstformen der Natur (from PNG alpha-transparencies of Haeckel's "Kustformen der natur" Proteus — Animated documentary film on Haeckel's life and work Ernst Haeckel Haus and Museum in Jena View works by Haeckel at the Biodiversity Heritage Library aDiatomea: artificial life experiment with 3d generated diatoms, influenced by Haeckel Images from Anthropogenie, oder, Entwickelungsgeschichte des menschen Works by Ernst Haeckel at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Ernst Haeckel at Internet Archive Works by Ernst Haeckel at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) v t e Natural history Pioneering naturalists Classical antiquity Aristotle (History of Animals) Theophrastus (Historia Plantarum) Aelian (De Natura Animalium) Pliny the Elder (Natural History) Dioscorides (De Materia Medica) The Renaissance Gaspard Bauhin (Pinax theatri botanici) Otto Brunfels Hieronymus Bock Andrea Cesalpino Valerius Cordus Leonhart Fuchs Conrad Gessner (Historia animalium) Frederik Ruysch William Turner (Avium Praecipuarum, New Herball) John Gerard (Herball, or Generall Historie of Plantes) The Enlightenment Robert Hooke (Micrographia) Antonie van Leeuwenhoek William Derham Hans Sloane Carl Linnaeus (Systema Naturae) Georg Steller Joseph Banks Johan Christian Fabricius James Hutton John Ray (Historia Plantarum) Comte de Buffon (Histoire Naturelle) Bernard Germain de Lacépède Gilbert White (The Natural History of Selborne) Thomas Bewick (A History of British Birds) Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (Philosophie Zoologique) 19th century George Montagu (Ornithological Dictionary) Georges Cuvier (Le Règne Animal) William Smith Charles Darwin (On the Origin of Species) Alfred Russel Wallace (The Malay Archipelago) Henry Walter Bates (The Naturalist on the River Amazons) Alexander von Humboldt John James Audubon (The Birds of America) William Buckland Charles Lyell Mary Anning Jean-Henri Fabre Louis Agassiz Philip Henry Gosse Asa Gray William Jackson Hooker Joseph Dalton Hooker William Jardine (The Naturalist's Library) Ernst Haeckel (Kunstformen der Natur) Richard Lydekker (The Royal Natural History) 20th century Abbott Thayer (Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom) Hugh B. Cott (Adaptive Coloration in Animals) Niko Tinbergen (The Study of Instinct) Konrad Lorenz (On Aggression) Karl von Frisch (The Dancing Bees) Ronald Lockley (Shearwaters) Topics Natural history museums (List) Parson-naturalists (List) Natural History Societies List of natural history dealers v t e Philosophy of religion Concepts in religion Afterlife Euthyphro dilemma Faith Intelligent design Miracle Problem of evil Religious belief Soul Spirit Theodicy Theological veto Conceptions of God Aristotelian view Brahman Demiurge Divine simplicity Egoism Holy Spirit Misotheism Pandeism Personal god Process theology Supreme Being Unmoved mover God in Abrahamic religions Buddhism Christianity Hinduism Islam Jainism Judaism Mormonism Sikhism Bahá'í Faith Wicca Existence of God For Beauty Christological Consciousness Cosmological Kalam Contingency Degree Desire Experience Fine-tuning of the Universe Love Miracles Morality Necessary existent Ontological Pascal's Wager Proper basis Reason Teleological Natural law Watchmaker analogy Transcendental Against 747 gambit Atheist's Wager Evil Free will Hell Inconsistent revelations Nonbelief Noncognitivism Occam's razor Omnipotence Poor design Russell's teapot Theology Acosmism Agnosticism Animism Antireligion Atheism Creationism Dharmism Deism Demonology Divine command theory Dualism Esotericism Exclusivism Existentialism Christian Agnostic Atheistic Feminist theology Thealogy Womanist theology Fideism Fundamentalism Gnosticism Henotheism Humanism Religious Secular Christian Inclusivism Theories about religions Monism Monotheism Mysticism Naturalism Metaphysical Religious Humanistic New Age Nondualism Nontheism Pandeism Panentheism Pantheism Perennialism Polytheism Possibilianism Process theology Religious skepticism Spiritualism Shamanism Taoic Theism Transcendentalism more... Religious language Eschatological verification Language-game Logical positivism Apophatic theology Verificationism Problem of evil Augustinian theodicy Best of all possible worlds Euthyphro dilemma Inconsistent triad Irenaean theodicy Natural evil Theodicy Philosophers of religion (by date active) Ancient and Medieval Anselm of Canterbury Augustine of Hippo Avicenna Averroes Boethius Erasmus Gaunilo of Marmoutiers Pico della Mirandola Heraclitus King James VI and I Marcion of Sinope Thomas Aquinas Maimonides Enlightenment Augustin Calmet René Descartes Blaise Pascal Baruch Spinoza Nicolas Malebranche Gottfried W Leibniz William Wollaston Thomas Chubb David Hume Baron d'Holbach Immanuel Kant Johann G Herder 1800 1850 Friedrich Schleiermacher Karl C F Krause Georg W F Hegel William Whewell Ludwig Feuerbach Søren Kierkegaard Karl Marx Albrecht Ritschl Afrikan Spir 1880 1900 Ernst Haeckel W. K. Clifford Friedrich Nietzsche Harald Høffding William James Vladimir Solovyov Ernst Troeltsch Rudolf Otto Lev Shestov Sergei Bulgakov Pavel Florensky Ernst Cassirer Joseph Maréchal 1920 postwar George Santayana Bertrand Russell Martin Buber René Guénon Paul Tillich Karl Barth Emil Brunner Rudolf Bultmann Gabriel Marcel Reinhold Niebuhr Charles Hartshorne Mircea Eliade J L Mackie Walter Kaufmann Martin Lings Peter Geach George I Mavrodes William Alston Antony Flew 1970 1990 2010 William L Rowe Dewi Z Phillips Alvin Plantinga Anthony Kenny Nicholas Wolterstorff Richard Swinburne Robert Merrihew Adams Peter van Inwagen Daniel Dennett Loyal Rue Jean-Luc Marion William Lane Craig Ali Akbar Rashad Alexander Pruss Related topics Criticism of religion Ethics in religion Exegesis History of religions Religion Religious language Religious philosophy Relationship between religion and science Political science of religion Faith and rationality more... Portal Category v t e Historical race concepts By color Black Bronze Brown Red White Yellow Anthropological Australoid Capoid Caucasoid Mongoloid Negroid Sub-types Alpine Arabid Armenoid Atlantid Borreby Brunn Caspian Dinaric East Baltic Ethiopid Hamitic Dravidian Irano-Afghan Japhetic Malay Mediterranean Neo-Mongoloid Neo-Danubian Nordic Northcaucasian Ladogan Lappish Pamirid Proto-Mongoloid Semitic Turanid Multiracial Miscegenation Ethnogenesis List of racially mixed groups Writers Louis Agassiz John Baker Erwin Baur John Beddoe Robert Bennett Bean François Bernier Renato Biasutti Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Franz Boas Paul Broca Alice Mossie Brues Halfdan Bryn Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon Charles Caldwell Petrus Camper Samuel A. Cartwright Houston Stewart Chamberlain Sonia Mary Cole Carleton S. Coon Georges Cuvier Jan Czekanowski Charles Davenport Joseph Deniker Egon Freiherr von Eickstedt Anténor Firmin Eugen Fischer John Fiske Francis Galton Stanley Marion Garn Reginald Ruggles Gates George Gliddon Arthur de Gobineau Madison Grant John Grattan Hans F. K. Günther Ernst Haeckel Frederick Ludwig Hoffman Earnest Hooton Julian Huxley Thomas Henry Huxley Calvin Ira Kephart Robert Knox Robert E. Kuttner Georges Vacher de Lapouge Fritz Lenz Carl Linnaeus Cesare Lombroso Bertil Lundman Felix von Luschan Dominick McCausland John Mitchell Ashley Montagu Lewis H. Morgan Samuel George Morton Josiah C. Nott Karl Pearson Oscar Peschel Isaac La Peyrère Charles Pickering Ludwig Hermann Plate Alfred Ploetz James Cowles Prichard Otto Reche Gustaf Retzius William Z. Ripley Alfred Rosenberg Benjamin Rush Henric Sanielevici Heinrich Schmidt Ilse Schwidetzky Charles Gabriel Seligman Giuseppe Sergi Samuel Stanhope Smith Herbert Spencer Morris Steggerda Lothrop Stoddard William Graham Sumner Thomas Griffith Taylor Paul Topinard John H. Van Evrie Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer Rudolf Virchow Voltaire Alexander Winchell Ludwig Woltmann Writings An Essay upon the Causes of the Different Colours of People in Different Climates (1744) The Outline of History of Mankind (1785) Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question (1849) An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races (1855) The Races of Europe (Ripley, 1899) The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century (1899) Race Life of the Aryan Peoples (1907) Heredity in Relation to Eugenics (1911) Castes in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development (1916) The Passing of the Great Race (1916) The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy (1920) The Myth of the Twentieth Century (1930) Annihilation of Caste (1936) The Races of Europe (Coon, 1939) An Investigation of Global Policy with the Yamato Race as Nucleus (1943) The Race Question (1950) Theories Eugenics Great chain of being Monogenism Polygenism Pre-Adamite Related History of anthropometry Racial categorization in India in Latin America in Brazil in Colombia in Singapore in the United States Scientific racism Nazism and race Racial hygiene Olive skin Whiteness in the United States Whitening Branqueamento/Blanqueamiento Passing Racial stereotypes Martial race Master race Color names Colorism Négritude Authority control WorldCat Identities VIAF: 73923565 LCCN: n50032763 ISNI: 0000 0001 2281 8485 GND: 118544381 SELIBR: 208848 SUDOC: 032207689 BNF: cb12328331d (data) BIBSYS: 90141879 MGP: 159000 NLA: 35850550 NDL: 00522309 NKC: jn20000700655 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CUBV\081864 Botanist: Haeckel BNE: XX1299881 RKD: 236982 IATH: w63n2mxm Retrieved from "" Categories: Zoologists with author abbreviations1834 births1919 deaths19th-century philosophersAlldeutscher Verband membersEvolutionary biologistsGerman atheistsGerman biologistsGerman ecologistsGerman humanistsGerman philosophersGerman zoologistsPeople from PotsdamPeople from the Province of BrandenburgProtistologistsScientific racismUniversity of Jena facultyWhite supremacistsGerman male writersLemuria19th-century German writers19th-century male writersHidden categories: Webarchive template wayback linksAll articles lacking reliable referencesArticles lacking reliable references from November 2015CS1 German-language sources (de)Use British English from April 2015Use dmy dates from November 2014Articles with hCardsWikipedia articles needing clarification from April 2015All articles with unsourced statementsArticles with unsourced statements from March 2015Botanists with author abbreviationsArticles with Project Gutenberg linksArticles with Internet Archive linksArticles with LibriVox linksAC with 17 elementsWikipedia articles with VIAF identifiersWikipedia articles with LCCN identifiersWikipedia articles with ISNI identifiersWikipedia articles with GND identifiersWikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiersWikipedia articles with BNF identifiersWikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiersWikipedia articles with NLA identifiersWikipedia articles with SBN identifiersWikipedia articles with RKDartists identifiersWikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers

Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate accountLog in Namespaces ArticleTalk Variants Views ReadEditView history More Search Navigation Main pageContentsFeatured contentCurrent eventsRandom articleDonate to WikipediaWikipedia store Interaction HelpAbout WikipediaCommunity portalRecent changesContact page Tools What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationWikidata itemCite this page Print/export Create a bookDownload as PDFPrintable version In other projects Wikimedia CommonsWikispeciesWikisource Languages AfrikaansالعربيةAragonésAsturianuAzərbaycancaتۆرکجهBân-lâm-gúБеларускаяБългарскиBosanskiBrezhonegCatalàČeštinaCymraegDanskDeutschEestiΕλληνικάEspañolEsperantoEuskaraفارسیFrançaisFryskGaeilgeGalego客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî한국어Հայերենहिन्दीHrvatskiBahasa IndonesiaÍslenskaItalianoעבריתBasa JawaҚазақшаKiswahiliКыргызчаLatinaLatviešuLëtzebuergeschMagyarMalagasyМонголNederlands日本語NorskNorsk nynorskOccitanਪੰਜਾਬੀپنجابیPolskiPortuguêsRomânăРусскийScotsSimple EnglishSlovenčinaSlovenščinaСрпски / srpskiSrpskohrvatski / српскохрватскиSuomiSvenskaTagalogதமிழ்Татарча/tatarçaTürkçeУкраїнськаTiếng ViệtVolapükWinaray粵語Žemaitėška中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 12 January 2018, at 03:47. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view (window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"0.692","walltime":"0.887","ppvisitednodes":{"value":5101,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":173997,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":7986,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":18,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":6,"limit":500},"entityaccesscount":{"value":1,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 685.140 1 -total"," 27.03% 185.170 1 Template:Reflist"," 19.47% 133.368 1 Template:Infobox_scientist"," 18.34% 125.643 1 Template:Infobox_person"," 13.86% 94.989 2 Template:Infobox"," 6.94% 47.515 2 Template:Citation"," 6.58% 45.095 7 Template:Navbox"," 6.29% 43.071 1 Template:Clarify"," 6.28% 43.044 1 Template:Botanist"," 5.91% 40.497 1 Template:Fix-span"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"0.272","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":9239258,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1220","timestamp":"20180115163121","ttl":86400,"transientcontent":true}}});});(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":123,"wgHostname":"mw1248"});});

Ernst_Haeckel - Photos and All Basic Informations

Ernst_Haeckel More Links

Haeckel (disambiguation)PotsdamKingdom Of PrussiaJenaWeimar RepublicGermansUniversity Of BerlinUniversity Of WürzburgUniversity Of JenaLinnean MedalDarwin–Wallace MedalUniversity Of JenaAuthor Citation (zoology)EnlargeEnlargeKunstformen Der NaturEnlargeEnlargeNicholai Miklukho-MaklaiCanary IslandsHelp:IPA/Standard GermanBiologistNatural HistorySpeciesGenealogicalBiologyAnthropogenyEcologyPhylumPhylogenyStem CellProtistaCharles DarwinRecapitulation TheoryOntogenyPhylogenyBiological IllustrationKunstformen Der NaturWorld RiddlePotsdamPrussiaMerseburgBerlinWürzburgAlbert Von KöllikerFranz LeydigRudolf VirchowJohannes Peter MüllerHermann SteudnerBotanyKarl GegenbaurHabilitationComparative AnatomyZoologyUniversity Of JenaRadiolarianPoriferanSpongeAnnelidMediterraneanCanary IslandsHermann FolCharles DarwinDown HouseThomas HuxleyCharles LyellWikipedia:Please ClarifyNorwayCroatiaHvarEgyptTurkeyGreeceEvangelical Church Of PrussiaJenaCarl ZeissAtheismRomanticismLamarckismNatural SelectionOntogenyPhylogenySocial ScienceWilhelm OstwaldGeorg Von ArcoHelene StöckerWalter Arthur BerendsohnFirst World WarIndianapolis StarCharles à Court RepingtonZoologistComparative AnatomyEvolutionary TheoryInvertebrateAnatomistRadiolariaMicroorganismPsychologyPhysiologyProtistaEvolutionKunstformen Der NaturNatural SelectionLamarckismEnlargeKarl Ernst Von BaerRecapitulation TheoryÉtienne SerresÉtienne Geoffroy Saint-HilaireRobert Edmond GrantOntogenyPhylogenyKarl Ernst Von BaerEmbryo DrawingsHeterochronyEmbryonic DevelopmentOn The Origin Of Species By Means Of Natural SelectionDutch East IndiesIndonesiaRichard HertwigOskar HertwigEugène DuboisEast IndiesJava ManHomo ErectusGreat ApesHomo ErectusHomo ErgasterPeking ManHomo FloresiensisCreationismPolygenismSamuel George MortonLouis AgassizRace (classification Of Human Beings)SpeciesCharles DarwinMonogenismHumanRecent African Origin Of Modern HumansAugust SchleicherLamarckismCarleton S. CoonSocial DarwinismScientific RacismFriedrich Müller (linguist)Caucasian RaceStephen Jay GouldNazi PartyAlfred RosenbergThe Myth Of The Twentieth CenturyWikipedia:Citation NeededDaniel GasmanFascistAsian Origin Of Modern HumansHindustanPrimateTransitional FossilLemuria (continent)PrimateHuman MigrationHuman MigrationLemuria (continent)EnlargeRecapitulation TheoryEmbryologyVertebrateRecapitulation TheoryGreat Chain Of BeingKarl Ernst Von BaerVon Baer's Laws (embryology)ArchetypeTransmutation Of SpeciesAlbert Von KöllikerOn The Origin Of SpeciesLouis AgassizBarnacleCrustaceanNaturphilosophieJohann Wolfgang Von GoetheLamarckismMorphology (biology)Evolutionary History Of LifeOntogenyPhylogenyEnlargeTree Of Life (biology)JenaRudolf VirchowEmbryological DrawingsEnlargeLudwig RütimeyerUniversity Of BaselStereotype (printing)Otto Von BismarckGerman EmpireMichael Foster (physiologist)University Of CambridgeThe Descent Of Man, And Selection In Relation To SexEnlargeKulturkampfWilhelm His Sr.Wilhelm His Sr.Robert J. RichardsRecapitulation TheoryWilhelm II, German EmperorLinnean Society Of LondonDarwin-Wallace MedalSierra Nevada (U.S.)List Of Mountains Of New Zealand By HeightAsteroid12323 HaeckelEnlargeMuscinaeEnlargeChaetopodaEnlargeMedusa (biology)On The Origin Of SpeciesDarwinismTransitional FossilEnlargeRiddle Of The UniverseKunstformen Der NaturList Of Botanists By Author Abbreviation (A)Author Citation (botany)Botanical NameDysteleologyEmbryologyHaeckelitesHaeckel's TaleHeinrich Schmidt (philosopher)Karl BlossfeldtList Of Wildlife ArtistsProteus (2004 Film)Wayback MachineInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/1-4102-1175-4Wikipedia:NOTRSUC BerkeleyHeinrich Schmidt (philosopher)Yale University PressInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/978-0-300-10798-2International Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-226-71214-1Gustav JahodaSicInternational Standard Serial NumberInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/978-0-8204-4108-5Digital Object IdentifierPubMed IdentifierDigital Object IdentifierPubMed IdentifierRobert J. RichardsInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/978-3-938616-39-0Wayback MachineInternational Plant Names IndexCharles DarwinOn The Origin Of SpeciesCharles DarwinCharles DarwinThe Descent Of Man, And Selection In Relation To SexAdrian DesmondInternational Standard Book NumberSpecial:BookSources/0-226-14374-0Wikipedia:Wikimedia Sister ProjectsJenaProject GutenbergInternet ArchiveLibriVoxTemplate:Natural HistoryTemplate Talk:Natural HistoryNatural HistoryClassical AntiquityAristotleHistory Of AnimalsTheophrastusHistoria Plantarum (Theophrastus)Claudius AelianusPliny The ElderNatural History (Pliny)Pedanius DioscoridesDe Materia MedicaThe RenaissanceGaspard BauhinOtto BrunfelsHieronymus BockAndrea CesalpinoValerius CordusLeonhart FuchsConrad GessnerHistoria Animalium (Gessner)Frederik RuyschWilliam Turner (naturalist)John GerardThe EnlightenmentRobert HookeMicrographiaAntonie Van LeeuwenhoekWilliam DerhamHans SloaneCarl LinnaeusSystema NaturaeGeorg Wilhelm StellerJoseph BanksJohan Christian FabriciusJames HuttonJohn RayHistoria Plantarum (Ray)Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte De BuffonHistoire NaturelleBernard Germain De LacépèdeGilbert WhiteThe Natural History And Antiquities Of SelborneThomas BewickA History Of British BirdsJean-Baptiste LamarckPhilosophie Zoologique19th CenturyGeorge Montagu (naturalist)Ornithological DictionaryGeorges CuvierLe Règne AnimalWilliam Smith (geologist)Charles DarwinOn The Origin Of SpeciesAlfred Russel WallaceThe Malay ArchipelagoHenry Walter BatesThe Naturalist On The River AmazonsAlexander Von HumboldtJohn James AudubonThe Birds Of AmericaWilliam BucklandCharles LyellMary AnningJean-Henri FabreLouis AgassizPhilip Henry GosseAsa GrayWilliam Jackson HookerJoseph Dalton HookerSir William Jardine, 7th BaronetKunstformen Der NaturRichard Lydekker20th CenturyAbbott Handerson ThayerConcealing-Coloration In The Animal KingdomHugh B. CottAdaptive Coloration In AnimalsNikolaas TinbergenKonrad LorenzOn AggressionKarl Von FrischRonald LockleySceliphron Wasp Building NestNatural History MuseumList Of Natural History MuseumsParson-naturalistList Of Parson-naturalistsCategory:Natural History SocietiesList Of Natural History DealersTemplate:Philosophy Of ReligionTemplate Talk:Philosophy Of ReligionPhilosophy Of ReligionAfterlifeEuthyphro DilemmaFaithIntelligent DesignMiracleProblem Of EvilReligious BeliefSoulSpiritTheodicyTheological VetoAristotelian TheologyBrahmanDemiurgeDivine SimplicityEthical EgoismHoly SpiritMisotheismPandeismPersonal GodProcess TheologySupreme BeingUnmoved MoverGod In Abrahamic ReligionsCreator In BuddhismGod In ChristianityGod In HinduismGod In IslamGod In JainismGod In JudaismGod In MormonismGod In SikhismGod In The Bahá'í FaithWiccan Views Of DivinityExistence Of GodArgument From BeautyChristological ArgumentArgument From ConsciousnessCosmological ArgumentKalam Cosmological ArgumentCosmological ArgumentArgument From DegreeArgument From DesireArgument From Religious ExperienceFine-tuned UniverseArgument From LoveArgument From MiraclesArgument From MoralityProof Of The TruthfulOntological ArgumentPascal's WagerArgument From A Proper BasisArgument From ReasonTeleological ArgumentNatural-law ArgumentWatchmaker AnalogyTranscendental Argument For The Existence Of GodUltimate Boeing 747 GambitAtheist's WagerProblem Of EvilArgument From Free WillProblem Of HellArgument From Inconsistent RevelationsArgument From NonbeliefTheological NoncognitivismOccam's RazorOmnipotence ParadoxArgument From Poor DesignRussell's TeapotTheologyAcosmismAgnosticismAnimismAntireligionAtheismCreationismDharmaDeismDemonologyDivine Command TheoryDualistic CosmologyWestern EsotericismExclusivismExistentialismChristian ExistentialismAgnostic ExistentialismAtheistic ExistentialismFeminist TheologyThealogyWomanist TheologyFideismFundamentalismGnosticismHenotheismHumanismReligious HumanismSecular HumanismChristian HumanismInclusivismTheories About ReligionsMonismMonotheismMysticismNaturalism (philosophy)Metaphysical NaturalismReligious NaturalismHumanistic NaturalismNew AgeNondualismNontheismPandeismPanentheismPantheismPerennial PhilosophyPolytheismPossibilianismProcess TheologyReligious SkepticismSpiritualism (beliefs)ShamanismEast Asian ReligionsTheismTranscendentalismList Of PhilosophiesProblem Of Religious LanguageEschatological VerificationLanguage-game (philosophy)Logical PositivismApophatic TheologyVerificationismProblem Of EvilAugustinian TheodicyBest Of All Possible WorldsEuthyphro DilemmaInconsistent TriadIrenaean TheodicyNatural EvilTheodicyCategory:Philosophers Of ReligionAnselm Of CanterburyAugustine Of HippoAvicennaAverroesBoethiusErasmusGaunilo Of MarmoutiersGiovanni Pico Della MirandolaHeraclitusJames VI And IMarcion Of SinopeThomas AquinasMaimonidesAntoine Augustin CalmetRené DescartesBlaise PascalBaruch SpinozaNicolas MalebrancheGottfried Wilhelm LeibnizWilliam WollastonThomas ChubbDavid HumeBaron D'HolbachImmanuel KantJohann Gottfried HerderFriedrich SchleiermacherKarl Christian Friedrich KrauseGeorg Wilhelm Friedrich HegelWilliam WhewellLudwig FeuerbachSøren KierkegaardKarl MarxAlbrecht RitschlAfrikan SpirWilliam Kingdon CliffordFriedrich NietzscheHarald HøffdingWilliam JamesVladimir Solovyov (philosopher)Ernst TroeltschRudolf OttoLev ShestovSergei BulgakovPavel FlorenskyErnst CassirerJoseph MaréchalGeorge SantayanaBertrand RussellMartin BuberRené GuénonPaul TillichKarl BarthEmil BrunnerRudolf BultmannGabriel MarcelReinhold NiebuhrCharles HartshorneMircea EliadeJ. L. MackieWalter Kaufmann (philosopher)Martin LingsPeter GeachGeorge I. MavrodesWilliam AlstonAntony FlewWilliam L. RoweDewi Zephaniah PhillipsAlvin PlantingaAnthony KennyNicholas WolterstorffRichard SwinburneRobert Merrihew AdamsPeter Van InwagenDaniel DennettLoyal RueJean-Luc MarionWilliam Lane CraigAli Akbar RashadAlexander PrussCriticism Of ReligionEthics In ReligionExegesisHistory Of ReligionsReligionProblem Of Religious LanguageReligious PhilosophyRelationship Between Religion And SciencePolitical Science Of ReligionFaith And RationalityIndex Of Philosophy Of Religion ArticlesPortal:PhilosophyCategory:Philosophy Of ReligionTemplate:Historical Definitions Of RaceTemplate Talk:Historical Definitions Of RaceHistorical Race ConceptsColor Terminology For RaceBlack PeopleBronze (racial Classification)Brown (racial Classification)Red PeopleWhite PeopleYellow PeopleBiological AnthropologyAustraloid RaceCapoid RaceCaucasian RaceMongoloidNegroidAlpine RaceArabid RaceArmenoid RaceAtlantid RaceThe Races Of Europe (Coon)The Races Of Europe (Coon)Caspian RaceDinaric RaceEast Baltic RaceEthiopid RaceHamiticDravidian PeoplesIrano-Afghan RaceJaphetitesMalay RaceMediterranean RaceNeo-MongoloidThe Races Of Europe (Coon)Nordic RaceNorthcaucasian RaceThe Races Of Europe (Coon)The Races Of Europe (Coon)Pamirid RaceProto-MongoloidSemitic PeopleTuranid RaceMultiracialMiscegenationEthnogenesisCategory:Multiracial AffairsLouis AgassizJohn Baker (biologist)Erwin BaurJohn BeddoeRobert Bennett BeanFrançois BernierRenato BiasuttiJohann Friedrich BlumenbachFranz BoasPaul BrocaAlice Mossie BruesHalfdan BrynGeorges-Louis Leclerc, Comte De BuffonCharles Caldwell (physician)Petrus CamperSamuel A. CartwrightHouston Stewart ChamberlainSonia Mary ColeCarleton S. CoonGeorges CuvierJan CzekanowskiCharles DavenportJoseph DenikerEgon Freiherr Von EickstedtAnténor FirminEugen FischerJohn Fiske (philosopher)Francis GaltonStanley Marion GarnReginald Ruggles GatesGeorge GliddonArthur De GobineauMadison GrantJohn GrattanHans F. K. GüntherFrederick Ludwig HoffmanEarnest HootonJulian HuxleyThomas Henry HuxleyCalvin Ira KephartRobert KnoxRobert E. KuttnerGeorges Vacher De LapougeFritz LenzCarl LinnaeusCesare LombrosoBertil LundmanFelix Von LuschanDominick McCauslandJohn Mitchell (geographer)Ashley MontaguLewis H. MorganSamuel George MortonJosiah C. NottKarl PearsonOscar PeschelIsaac La PeyrèreCharles Pickering (naturalist)Ludwig Hermann PlateAlfred PloetzJames Cowles PrichardOtto RecheGustaf RetziusWilliam Z. RipleyAlfred RosenbergBenjamin RushHenric SanieleviciHeinrich Schmidt (philosopher)Ilse SchwidetzkyCharles Gabriel SeligmanGiuseppe SergiSamuel Stanhope SmithHerbert SpencerMorris SteggerdaLothrop StoddardWilliam Graham SumnerThomas Griffith TaylorPaul TopinardJohn H. Van EvrieOtmar Freiherr Von VerschuerRudolf VirchowVoltaireAlexander WinchellLudwig WoltmannJohn Mitchell (geographer)Christoph MeinersOccasional Discourse On The Negro QuestionAn Essay On The Inequality Of The Human RacesThe Races Of Europe (Ripley)The Foundations Of The Nineteenth CenturyRace Life Of The Aryan PeoplesHeredity In Relation To EugenicsCastes In India: Their Mechanism, Genesis And DevelopmentThe Passing Of The Great RaceThe Rising Tide Of Color Against White World-SupremacyThe Myth Of The Twentieth CenturyAnnihilation Of CasteThe Races Of Europe (Coon)An Investigation Of Global Policy With The Yamato Race As NucleusThe Race QuestionEugenicsGreat Chain Of BeingMonogenismPolygenismPre-AdamiteHistory Of AnthropometryRace (human Categorization)Historical Definitions Of Races In IndiaRace And Ethnicity In Latin AmericaRace In BrazilRace And Ethnicity In ColombiaRace In SingaporeRace And Ethnicity In The United StatesScientific RacismNazism And RaceRacial HygieneOlive SkinWhiteness StudiesDefinitions Of Whiteness In The United StatesRacial WhiteningBlanqueamientoPassing (race)Racial StereotypeMartial RaceMaster RaceColor Terminology For RaceColorismNégritudeHelp:Authority ControlVirtual International Authority FileLibrary Of Congress Control NumberInternational Standard Name IdentifierIntegrated Authority FileLIBRISSystème Universitaire De DocumentationBibliothèque Nationale De FranceBIBSYSMathematics Genealogy ProjectNational Library Of AustraliaNational Diet LibraryNational Library Of The Czech RepublicIstituto Centrale Per Il Catalogo UnicoAuthor Citation (botany)Biblioteca Nacional De EspañaNetherlands Institute For Art HistoryInstitute For Advanced Technology In The HumanitiesHelp:CategoryCategory:Zoologists With Author AbbreviationsCategory:1834 BirthsCategory:1919 DeathsCategory:19th-century PhilosophersCategory:Alldeutscher Verband MembersCategory:Evolutionary BiologistsCategory:German AtheistsCategory:German BiologistsCategory:German EcologistsCategory:German HumanistsCategory:German PhilosophersCategory:German ZoologistsCategory:People From PotsdamCategory:People From The Province Of BrandenburgCategory:ProtistologistsCategory:Scientific RacismCategory:University Of Jena FacultyCategory:White SupremacistsCategory:German Male WritersCategory:LemuriaCategory:19th-century German WritersCategory:19th-century Male WritersCategory:Webarchive Template Wayback LinksCategory:All Articles Lacking Reliable ReferencesCategory:Articles Lacking Reliable References From November 2015Category:CS1 German-language Sources (de)Category:Use British English From April 2015Category:Use Dmy Dates From November 2014Category:Articles With HCardsCategory:Wikipedia Articles Needing Clarification From April 2015Category:All Articles With Unsourced StatementsCategory:Articles With Unsourced Statements From March 2015Category:Botanists With Author AbbreviationsCategory:Articles With Project Gutenberg LinksCategory:Articles With Internet Archive LinksCategory:Articles With LibriVox LinksCategory:AC With 17 ElementsCategory:Wikipedia Articles With VIAF IdentifiersCategory:Wikipedia Articles With LCCN IdentifiersCategory:Wikipedia Articles With ISNI IdentifiersCategory:Wikipedia Articles With GND IdentifiersCategory:Wikipedia Articles With SELIBR IdentifiersCategory:Wikipedia Articles With BNF IdentifiersCategory:Wikipedia Articles With BIBSYS IdentifiersCategory:Wikipedia Articles With NLA IdentifiersCategory:Wikipedia Articles With SBN IdentifiersCategory:Wikipedia Articles With RKDartists IdentifiersCategory:Wikipedia Articles With SNAC-ID IdentifiersDiscussion About Edits From This IP Address [n]A List Of Edits Made From This IP Address [y]View The Content Page [c]Discussion About The Content Page [t]Edit This Page [e]Visit The Main Page [z]Guides To Browsing WikipediaFeatured Content – The Best Of WikipediaFind Background Information On Current EventsLoad A Random Article [x]Guidance On How To Use And Edit WikipediaFind Out About WikipediaAbout The Project, What You Can Do, Where To Find ThingsA List Of Recent Changes In The Wiki [r]List Of All English Wikipedia Pages Containing Links To This Page [j]Recent Changes In Pages Linked From This Page [k]Upload Files [u]A List Of All Special Pages [q]Wikipedia:AboutWikipedia:General Disclaimer

view link view link view link view link view link